Navigating Tensions and Contradictions: The Everyday Negotiation of Militant Research

ABSTRACT This paper explores the tensions and contradictions generated when conducting militant research from within academia. More specifically, it focuses on how they play out and shape militant research on an everyday basis, and how they are constantly negotiated by militant researchers and mediated by their diverse positionalities. Drawing from my own experience of militant research in the British West Midlands, I discuss the three main tensions that I had to navigate and negotiate during my PhD. First, I examine the conflict between collective aspirations and professional motivations, and I call for the need to find a balance between them that allows the militant researcher to stay in academia whilst avoiding the extractivist dynamics of pseudo‐militancy. I argue for a strategy of alignment as a principle that can guide the daily process of militant research in trying to bring together collective and professional motivations. Second, I discuss how the unfitting positionality of militant researchers ends up creating a double impostor syndrome that makes us feel like both unworthy academics and activists. Whereas, a supportive institutional environment is crucial to cope with the academic side of it, commitment and reciprocity between the militant researcher and the community of struggle are key elements to negotiate the militant side. Third, I discuss the challenge of operating across diverse knowledges that are hierarchically organised and the need to constantly translate contexts and epistemic settings. I argue that both theoretical and practice‐oriented knowledges are important for militant research and that they can get together in feedback loops that spur socio‐ecological transformation. In conclusion, by recounting my lived experience, I conceptualise militant research as a complex, dynamic and contested practice composed of multiple intertwined tensions that are mediated by positionality. It is a process of constant negotiation on an everyday basis that can potentially push transformation forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Area
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/area.70067
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Tensions and Contradictions: The Everyday Negotiation of Militant Research

Sergio Ruiz Cayuela
Area
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Navigating Tensions and Contradictions: The Everyday Negotiation of Militant Research

Sergio Ruiz Cayuela
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the tensions and contradictions generated when conducting militant research from within academia. More specifically, it focuses on how they play out and shape militant research on an everyday basis, and how they are constantly negotiated by militant researchers and mediated by their diverse positionalities. Drawing from my own experience of militant research in the British West Midlands, I discuss the three main tensions that I had to navigate and negotiate during my PhD. First, I examine the conflict between collective aspirations and professional motivations, and I call for the need to find a balance between them that allows the militant researcher to stay in academia whilst avoiding the extractivist dynamics of pseudo‐militancy. I argue for a strategy of alignment as a principle that can guide the daily process of militant research in trying to bring together collective and professional motivations. Second, I discuss how the unfitting positionality of militant researchers ends up creating a double impostor syndrome that makes us feel like both unworthy academics and activists. Whereas, a supportive institutional environment is crucial to cope with the academic side of it, commitment and reciprocity between the militant researcher and the community of struggle are key elements to negotiate the militant side. Third, I discuss the challenge of operating across diverse knowledges that are hierarchically organised and the need to constantly translate contexts and epistemic settings. I argue that both theoretical and practice‐oriented knowledges are important for militant research and that they can get together in feedback loops that spur socio‐ecological transformation. In conclusion, by recounting my lived experience, I conceptualise militant research as a complex, dynamic and contested practice composed of multiple intertwined tensions that are mediated by positionality. It is a process of constant negotiation on an everyday basis that can potentially push transformation forward.

Area
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.