Engagement to Identify Health Priorities of People With Intellectual and/or Developmental Disability

People with lived experiences are often excluded from development of solutions and decision-making related to health research and policy. To describe and demonstrate how high-quality engagement supports partner and project outcomes. The ultimate project outcome was to identify health priorities desired by people with intellectual and/or developmental disability (IDD) and the people who support achieving those priorities, including caregivers, clinicians, and payers/regulators. This capacity-building project implemented and evaluated methods of engagement of IDD self-advocates, caregivers/partners, clinicians, payers/regulators, and researchers. Our reliance on a variety of engagement approaches, but particularly graphic illustration and other visual engagement, yielded productive conversations to advance areas of priority. Partners felt satisfied with engagement and continued to participate at multiple points throughout the 2-year project. We identified nine illustrated priority health outcomes useful for research, practice, and policy change. Our engagement and priority-setting approach resulted in findings that partners found compelling personally and professionally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492251385448
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engagement to Identify Health Priorities of People With Intellectual and/or Developmental Disability

May-Lynn Andresen, Jennifer E. Jaremski, Joanne Nicholson, Carolyn S. Langer et al.
1 citations
OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
1.88
article

Engagement to Identify Health Priorities of People With Intellectual and/or Developmental Disability

May-Lynn Andresen, Jennifer E. Jaremski, Joanne Nicholson, Carolyn S. Langer, Vincent Siasoco, Teal Benevides, Kristen Faughnan, Stephen M. Shore, Alexis Hernandez‐Hons, Tim Corey, Hoangmai H. Pham, Madelyn Bahr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

People with lived experiences are often excluded from development of solutions and decision-making related to health research and policy. To describe and demonstrate how high-quality engagement supports partner and project outcomes. The ultimate project outcome was to identify health priorities desired by people with intellectual and/or developmental disability (IDD) and the people who support achieving those priorities, including caregivers, clinicians, and payers/regulators. This capacity-building project implemented and evaluated methods of engagement of IDD self-advocates, caregivers/partners, clinicians, payers/regulators, and researchers. Our reliance on a variety of engagement approaches, but particularly graphic illustration and other visual engagement, yielded productive conversations to advance areas of priority. Partners felt satisfied with engagement and continued to participate at multiple points throughout the 2-year project. We identified nine illustrated priority health outcomes useful for research, practice, and policy change. Our engagement and priority-setting approach resulted in findings that partners found compelling personally and professionally.

OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of ResearchVol. 46(2)
Infectious Disease Research Institute (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), Augusta University (US), ET Enterprises (United Kingdom) (GB), Brandeis University (US), Adelphi University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.