Numerical relativity simulations of compact binaries: Comparison of cell- and vertex-centered adaptive meshes

Given the compact binary evolution problem of numerical relativity, in the finite-difference, block-based, adaptive mesh refinement context, choices must be made on how evolved fields are to be discretized. In -thena++, the space-time solver was previously fixed to be vertex centered. Here, our recent extensions to a cell-centered treatment are described. Simplifications in the handling of variables during the treatment of general relativistic magneto-hydrodynamical (GRMHD) evolution are found. A novelty is that performance comparison for the two choices of grid sampling is made within a single code base. In the case of a binary black hole inspiral-merger problem, by evolving geometric fields on vertex centers, an average <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mo>∼</a:mo> <a:mn>20</a:mn> <a:mo>%</a:mo> </a:math> speed increase is observed, when compared against cell-centered sampling. The opposite occurs in the GRMHD setting. A binary neutron star inspiral-merger-collapse problem, representative of typical production simulations, is considered. We find that cell-centered sampling for the space-time solver improves performance, by a similar factor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/lxp5-c1g1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical relativity simulations of compact binaries: Comparison of cell- and vertex-centered adaptive meshes

Boris Daszuta, P. Hammond, Jacob Fields, William R. Cook et al.
2 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
2.31
article

Numerical relativity simulations of compact binaries: Comparison of cell- and vertex-centered adaptive meshes

Boris Daszuta, P. Hammond, Jacob Fields, William R. Cook, David Radice, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Eduardo M. Gutiérrez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Given the compact binary evolution problem of numerical relativity, in the finite-difference, block-based, adaptive mesh refinement context, choices must be made on how evolved fields are to be discretized. In -thena++, the space-time solver was previously fixed to be vertex centered. Here, our recent extensions to a cell-centered treatment are described. Simplifications in the handling of variables during the treatment of general relativistic magneto-hydrodynamical (GRMHD) evolution are found. A novelty is that performance comparison for the two choices of grid sampling is made within a single code base. In the case of a binary black hole inspiral-merger problem, by evolving geometric fields on vertex centers, an average <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mo>∼</a:mo> <a:mn>20</a:mn> <a:mo>%</a:mo> </a:math> speed increase is observed, when compared against cell-centered sampling. The opposite occurs in the GRMHD setting. A binary neutron star inspiral-merger-collapse problem, representative of typical production simulations, is considered. We find that cell-centered sampling for the space-time solver improves performance, by a similar factor.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(10)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.