Systematic Evaluation of Trade-Offs in Motion Planning Algorithms for Optimal Industrial Robotic Work Cell Design

The performance of industrial robotic work cells depends on optimizing various hyperparameters referring to the cell layout, such as robot base placement, tool placement, and kinematic design. One prominent approach is bilevel optimization, where the high-level optimization adjusts these hyperparameters, and the low-level optimization computes robot motions. However, computing the optimal robot motion is computationally infeasible, introducing trade-offs in motion planning to make the problem tractable. These trade-offs significantly impact the overall performance of the bilevel optimization, but their effects still need to be systematically evaluated. This paper introduces metrics for optimality, time gain, robustness, and consistency to assess these trade-offs. Through extensive simulation studies, we identify suitable motion-level optimization formulations that balance computational tractability and solution accuracy. The proposed algorithms are applied to find the time-optimal kinematic design for a modular robot in two palletization scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.10.134
Primary Topic
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Evaluation of Trade-Offs in Motion Planning Algorithms for Optimal Industrial Robotic Work Cell Design

Andreas Kugi, Christian Hartl-Nesic, Guillaume de Mathelin
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
article

Systematic Evaluation of Trade-Offs in Motion Planning Algorithms for Optimal Industrial Robotic Work Cell Design

Andreas Kugi, Christian Hartl-Nesic, Guillaume de Mathelin
article en

Abstract

The performance of industrial robotic work cells depends on optimizing various hyperparameters referring to the cell layout, such as robot base placement, tool placement, and kinematic design. One prominent approach is bilevel optimization, where the high-level optimization adjusts these hyperparameters, and the low-level optimization computes robot motions. However, computing the optimal robot motion is computationally infeasible, introducing trade-offs in motion planning to make the problem tractable. These trade-offs significantly impact the overall performance of the bilevel optimization, but their effects still need to be systematically evaluated. This paper introduces metrics for optimality, time gain, robustness, and consistency to assess these trade-offs. Through extensive simulation studies, we identify suitable motion-level optimization formulations that balance computational tractability and solution accuracy. The proposed algorithms are applied to find the time-optimal kinematic design for a modular robot in two palletization scenarios.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(17)
AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT), TU Wien (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systematic Evaluation of Trade-Offs in Motion Planning Algorithms for Optimal Industrial Robotic Work Cell Design — Andreas Kugi, Christian Hartl-Nesic, et al. · IFAC-PapersOnLine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS