Comprehensive assessment of working fluid selection for ocean thermal energy conversion

• Ten working fluids (Ammonia, R152a, R134a, R32, R22, R1270, R600a, R290, R744, R245fa) were analyzed. • Evaluation includes enthalpy, safety, environmental impact, and cost. • Mass and heat balance were modeled using in-house code and ASPEN+ simulations. • Each working fluid affects component size, especially heat exchangers and pumps. • Ammonia shows the highest overall score in the OTEC working fluid assessment. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) is a type of ocean renewable energy that generates electricity by utilizing the temperature difference between warm surface seawater and cold deep seawater. Despite its vast potential, especially in tropical regions, OTEC technology remains at the pilot stage. To enhance the implementation of OTEC on a commercial scale, this study aims to determine the working fluid by conducting an in-depth analysis of working fluid selection in OTEC systems, focusing on energy efficiency, safety, and environmental impact. The study involved modeling and creating an in-house program to calculate the heat and mass balance, which was validated using ASPEN+ software in the single-stage Rankine cycle system. The working fluid selection optimization study was conducted through two stages of selection. At the initial stage, the selection involved ten candidate working fluids, based on a literature review of their characteristics, safety, environmental impact, and cost. From the initial selection, four candidates with the highest assessment results were selected, namely Ammonia, R134a, R32, and R22. The second selection stage involved assessing the influence of the four fluids on the quality of power generation and the main equipment specifications for the prospective working fluid. The final results show that Ammonia achieved the highest total score of 37, followed by R32 with a score of 28. In contrast, R22 and R134a scored 23 and 21, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108086
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive assessment of working fluid selection for ocean thermal energy conversion

Ariyana Dwiputra Nugraha, Gerry Giliant Salamena, Ristiyanto Adiputra, Aditya Rio Prabowo et al.
1 citations
Results in Engineering
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
0.71
article

Comprehensive assessment of working fluid selection for ocean thermal energy conversion

Ariyana Dwiputra Nugraha, Gerry Giliant Salamena, Ristiyanto Adiputra, Aditya Rio Prabowo, Navik Puryantini, Rasgianti Rasgianti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Ten working fluids (Ammonia, R152a, R134a, R32, R22, R1270, R600a, R290, R744, R245fa) were analyzed. • Evaluation includes enthalpy, safety, environmental impact, and cost. • Mass and heat balance were modeled using in-house code and ASPEN+ simulations. • Each working fluid affects component size, especially heat exchangers and pumps. • Ammonia shows the highest overall score in the OTEC working fluid assessment. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) is a type of ocean renewable energy that generates electricity by utilizing the temperature difference between warm surface seawater and cold deep seawater. Despite its vast potential, especially in tropical regions, OTEC technology remains at the pilot stage. To enhance the implementation of OTEC on a commercial scale, this study aims to determine the working fluid by conducting an in-depth analysis of working fluid selection in OTEC systems, focusing on energy efficiency, safety, and environmental impact. The study involved modeling and creating an in-house program to calculate the heat and mass balance, which was validated using ASPEN+ software in the single-stage Rankine cycle system. The working fluid selection optimization study was conducted through two stages of selection. At the initial stage, the selection involved ten candidate working fluids, based on a literature review of their characteristics, safety, environmental impact, and cost. From the initial selection, four candidates with the highest assessment results were selected, namely Ammonia, R134a, R32, and R22. The second selection stage involved assessing the influence of the four fluids on the quality of power generation and the main equipment specifications for the prospective working fluid. The final results show that Ammonia achieved the highest total score of 37, followed by R32 with a score of 28. In contrast, R22 and R134a scored 23 and 21, respectively.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Sebelas Maret University (ID), Dynamic Research (United States) (US), Indonesian Orthopaedic Association (ID), National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.