Decoupling tea-bud heap structure from non-imaging hyperspectral spectra for accurate single-bud trace biochemistry retrieval

Accurate, real-time, non-destructive estimation of single-bud biochemistry is critical for managing green-tea quality, yet non-imaging hyperspectral measurements of arbitrarily stacked buds are confounded by structured interference from mixed adaxial/abaxial surfaces and their three-dimensional arrangement. We propose Bilinear Spectral Derivative Gaussian Process Regression (BSDGPR), which couples a bilinear spectral-derivative model with Gaussian process regression to minimise structured interference. First- and second-order spectral derivatives attenuate the weakly wavelength-dependent leaf-spatial-arrangement term ( R LSA ), while unit-sphere normalization combined with a chord-distance radial basis function kernel eliminate the plan-view leaf-front area fraction ( f ). This effectively standardizes tea-bud heap spectra to single-bud equivalents. (i) Structure suppression and invariance: independent-contribution analysis shows that moving to the derivative domain boosts the heap term's explanatory power to 80.7–99.4 % across bands while reducing R LSA to ≤9.3 % (TH:LSA ratio of between 4.8 and 40.9), and the sphere-normalized chord-distance kernel cancels f -driven gain variation across samples. (ii) Accuracy and efficiency: relative to reflectance-domain GPR, BSDGPR raises R 2 by 0.13 and lowers NRMSE by 3–5 percentage points for tea polyphenols (0.68 → 0.81; 15.55 % → 12.64 %), amino acids (0.56 → 0.71; 19.78 % → 15.72 %), and soluble sugars (0.86 → 0.91; 10.85 % → 9.05 %), while maintaining fast inference (10–13 s per model) suitable for near real-time use. (iii) Transferability: models trained on tea-bud heaps generalize to canopy measurements with minimal loss (ΔR 2 ≤ 0.05; canopy NRMSE 11–15 %), remain credible across cultivars (R 2 = 0.37–0.74; NRMSE ≤23 % across 15 varieties), are stable at typical sensor resolutions (≤ 10–15 nm), and achieve R 2 = 0.63–0.66 with NRMSE ≤22 % for wheat canopy chlorophyll. Overall, BSDGPR is a reliable, field-ready AI approach for non-destructive biochemical sensing across crops, sensors, and management scenarios, offering broad applicability and strong potential for precision agriculture. • Physically interpretable BSDGPR converts heap spectra to single-bud equivalents, suppressing R LSA and f . • BSDGPR exceeds GPR accuracy, raising R 2 by 0.13 and lowering NRMSE by 3–5 % across constituents. • Inference is near real time, requiring approximately 10–13 s per model on field spectra. • Models transfer robustly from heaps to canopies (ΔR 2 ≤ 0.05) and across cultivars (NRMSE ≤23 %).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2025.11.003
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoupling tea-bud heap structure from non-imaging hyperspectral spectra for accurate single-bud trace biochemistry retrieval

Guijun Yang, Jinpeng Cheng, Chunjiang Zhao, Bo Xu et al.
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
article

Decoupling tea-bud heap structure from non-imaging hyperspectral spectra for accurate single-bud trace biochemistry retrieval

Guijun Yang, Jinpeng Cheng, Chunjiang Zhao, Bo Xu, Ze Xu, N. D. Qi, Jianbo Qi, Wenjuan Li, Xiaodong Yang, Hao Yang
article en

Abstract

Accurate, real-time, non-destructive estimation of single-bud biochemistry is critical for managing green-tea quality, yet non-imaging hyperspectral measurements of arbitrarily stacked buds are confounded by structured interference from mixed adaxial/abaxial surfaces and their three-dimensional arrangement. We propose Bilinear Spectral Derivative Gaussian Process Regression (BSDGPR), which couples a bilinear spectral-derivative model with Gaussian process regression to minimise structured interference. First- and second-order spectral derivatives attenuate the weakly wavelength-dependent leaf-spatial-arrangement term ( R LSA ), while unit-sphere normalization combined with a chord-distance radial basis function kernel eliminate the plan-view leaf-front area fraction ( f ). This effectively standardizes tea-bud heap spectra to single-bud equivalents. (i) Structure suppression and invariance: independent-contribution analysis shows that moving to the derivative domain boosts the heap term's explanatory power to 80.7–99.4 % across bands while reducing R LSA to ≤9.3 % (TH:LSA ratio of between 4.8 and 40.9), and the sphere-normalized chord-distance kernel cancels f -driven gain variation across samples. (ii) Accuracy and efficiency: relative to reflectance-domain GPR, BSDGPR raises R 2 by 0.13 and lowers NRMSE by 3–5 percentage points for tea polyphenols (0.68 → 0.81; 15.55 % → 12.64 %), amino acids (0.56 → 0.71; 19.78 % → 15.72 %), and soluble sugars (0.86 → 0.91; 10.85 % → 9.05 %), while maintaining fast inference (10–13 s per model) suitable for near real-time use. (iii) Transferability: models trained on tea-bud heaps generalize to canopy measurements with minimal loss (ΔR 2 ≤ 0.05; canopy NRMSE 11–15 %), remain credible across cultivars (R 2 = 0.37–0.74; NRMSE ≤23 % across 15 varieties), are stable at typical sensor resolutions (≤ 10–15 nm), and achieve R 2 = 0.63–0.66 with NRMSE ≤22 % for wheat canopy chlorophyll. Overall, BSDGPR is a reliable, field-ready AI approach for non-destructive biochemical sensing across crops, sensors, and management scenarios, offering broad applicability and strong potential for precision agriculture. • Physically interpretable BSDGPR converts heap spectra to single-bud equivalents, suppressing R LSA and f . • BSDGPR exceeds GPR accuracy, raising R 2 by 0.13 and lowering NRMSE by 3–5 % across constituents. • Inference is near real time, requiring approximately 10–13 s per model on field spectra. • Models transfer robustly from heaps to canopies (ΔR 2 ≤ 0.05) and across cultivars (NRMSE ≤23 %).

Artificial Intelligence in AgricultureVol. 16(1)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Chang'an University (CN), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN), Tea Research Institute (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture (CN), State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science (CN), Henan Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.