Time for Change? A Commentary on Scan Time Guidelines in Australasian Sonography

ABSTRACT Despite the growing volume and complexity of ultrasound examinations across Australia and New Zealand, formal scan time guidelines remain absent. This commentary examines the implications of unregulated scan durations on diagnostic quality, patient safety and sonographer wellbeing. Drawing on recent Australasian research, it highlights the disconnect between appointment length and actual transducer time, with many sonographers reporting time pressures that compromise care, contribute to work‐related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) and lead to burnout. International models from the United Kingdom and Canada offer structured approaches to scan time allocation, integrating allowances for complexity, teaching and reporting. Adopting similar standards in Australasia could support consistent care, sustainable workloads and improved workforce retention. The commentary argues that development should be collaborative, involving sonographers across public and private sectors and be adaptable to diverse practice settings. As the profession evolves, establishing scan time benchmarks is not only a practical necessity but an ethical imperative. Time is a finite resource; how we manage it will define the future of sonography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sonography
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sono.70020
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time for Change? A Commentary on Scan Time Guidelines in Australasian Sonography

Paula Kinnane, Emma Jardine
Sonography
Radiology practices and education
article

Time for Change? A Commentary on Scan Time Guidelines in Australasian Sonography

Paula Kinnane, Emma Jardine
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the growing volume and complexity of ultrasound examinations across Australia and New Zealand, formal scan time guidelines remain absent. This commentary examines the implications of unregulated scan durations on diagnostic quality, patient safety and sonographer wellbeing. Drawing on recent Australasian research, it highlights the disconnect between appointment length and actual transducer time, with many sonographers reporting time pressures that compromise care, contribute to work‐related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) and lead to burnout. International models from the United Kingdom and Canada offer structured approaches to scan time allocation, integrating allowances for complexity, teaching and reporting. Adopting similar standards in Australasia could support consistent care, sustainable workloads and improved workforce retention. The commentary argues that development should be collaborative, involving sonographers across public and private sectors and be adaptable to diverse practice settings. As the profession evolves, establishing scan time benchmarks is not only a practical necessity but an ethical imperative. Time is a finite resource; how we manage it will define the future of sonography.

SonographyVol. 12(4)
Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.