Investigations into aerial shooting approaches to achieve rapid removal of feral and pest animals

Context Invasive animals continue to have a significant impact on the Australian landscape despite continual control efforts. Aerial shooting from helicopters is the most common tool used to control these animals at the landscape scale. However, most aerial shooting programs are generally applied ad hoc, prioritise effort based on assumed spatial distribution and are based primarily on visual sightings of the target species. Aims To determine whether a systematic search approach using thermal technology could improve removal rates during invasive animal shooting campaigns to maximise management outcomes. Methods We evaluated the impact of following-up two standard habitat-informed aerial shooting programs (one with thermal and one without) with a program that utilised a systematic search pattern utilising thermal equipment. We assessed the effectiveness of each program in reducing invasive animal populations and provide a cost comparison of each technique. Key results Neither habitat-informed approach achieved management level reductions for any species targeted. The systematic approach reduced pig populations at both sites by >95%; a similar result was not achieved for goats or deer. Multi-species aerial shooting programs may decrease overall program effectiveness and non-participating landholders can provide areas of refuge to allow for rapid reinvasion. During both systematic search programs, 26% and 10% of animals were found outside of the effective search areas of the visual and thermal habitat-informed programs respectively. Conclusions The systematic-with-thermal search approach can result in rapid local removal of pigs when it follows a habitat-informed approach. The systematic approach resulted in detections of target animals in areas the crew did not expect to find them. Targeting multiple species in a program appears to reduce program effectiveness. Implications Our results demonstrated that following a habitat-informed aerial shooting program with a systematic-with-thermal program can result in a rapid removal of >95% of feral pigs. For habitat-informed programs the addition of a thermographer can improve program outcomes. Multi-species aerial shooting programs may result in decreased effectiveness overall, although further research on the functional response in multi-species programs is required before any conclusions can be drawn.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Research
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wr25020
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigations into aerial shooting approaches to achieve rapid removal of feral and pest animals

Tarnya Cox, Michael Leane, Richard Baker, Jessica Sparkes et al.
Wildlife Research
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Investigations into aerial shooting approaches to achieve rapid removal of feral and pest animals

Tarnya Cox, Michael Leane, Richard Baker, Jessica Sparkes, Robert Matthews
article en

Abstract

Context Invasive animals continue to have a significant impact on the Australian landscape despite continual control efforts. Aerial shooting from helicopters is the most common tool used to control these animals at the landscape scale. However, most aerial shooting programs are generally applied ad hoc, prioritise effort based on assumed spatial distribution and are based primarily on visual sightings of the target species. Aims To determine whether a systematic search approach using thermal technology could improve removal rates during invasive animal shooting campaigns to maximise management outcomes. Methods We evaluated the impact of following-up two standard habitat-informed aerial shooting programs (one with thermal and one without) with a program that utilised a systematic search pattern utilising thermal equipment. We assessed the effectiveness of each program in reducing invasive animal populations and provide a cost comparison of each technique. Key results Neither habitat-informed approach achieved management level reductions for any species targeted. The systematic approach reduced pig populations at both sites by >95%; a similar result was not achieved for goats or deer. Multi-species aerial shooting programs may decrease overall program effectiveness and non-participating landholders can provide areas of refuge to allow for rapid reinvasion. During both systematic search programs, 26% and 10% of animals were found outside of the effective search areas of the visual and thermal habitat-informed programs respectively. Conclusions The systematic-with-thermal search approach can result in rapid local removal of pigs when it follows a habitat-informed approach. The systematic approach resulted in detections of target animals in areas the crew did not expect to find them. Targeting multiple species in a program appears to reduce program effectiveness. Implications Our results demonstrated that following a habitat-informed aerial shooting program with a systematic-with-thermal program can result in a rapid removal of >95% of feral pigs. For habitat-informed programs the addition of a thermographer can improve program outcomes. Multi-species aerial shooting programs may result in decreased effectiveness overall, although further research on the functional response in multi-species programs is required before any conclusions can be drawn.

Wildlife ResearchVol. 52(11)
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), Department of Environment and Conservation (CA), Services Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.