ALAT-SEPAR Consensus on the Definition and Classification of Asthma Exacerbations by Severity: A Move Toward International Standardization

Asthma exacerbation is a significant clinical event that occurs with varying severity, yet a set of universally accepted standardized definitions is still needed. The aim of this consensus developed by ALAT and SEPAR was to fill this gap with a validated proposal for classifying asthma exacerbations into levels of severity: non-severe, severe, and very severe. The consensus was based on an in-depth review of the literature conducted by the scientific committee to identify key parameters for each level of severity, including worsening symptoms, respiratory function changes, and the need for specific medical interventions. A total of 67 publications were analyzed to generate a questionnaire on the defining elements of asthma exacerbations, and this was put to the vote. Twenty-eight international experts participated in the validation of characteristics and definitions of exacerbation severity following Delphi methodology. The resulting definitions clearly distinguish non-severe exacerbations (requiring minor adjustments in treatment) from severe exacerbations (requiring more intensive interventions, including longer systemic corticosteroid use or hospitalization) and very severe exacerbations (life-threatening events requiring intensive care). These definitions provide a standardized framework that facilitates comparison between clinical trials and optimizes patient care. This consensus lays the foundation for unifying management criteria in global clinical practice and fostering research on the efficacy of asthma treatments. It also underlines the importance of accurate classification in improving clinical outcomes and reducing the overall burden of disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Respiratory Archives
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100469
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ALAT-SEPAR Consensus on the Definition and Classification of Asthma Exacerbations by Severity: A Move Toward International Standardization

Carmen Pérez Cano, Vicente Plaza, Alicia Padilla‐Galo, Ana María Stok et al.
Open Respiratory Archives
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

ALAT-SEPAR Consensus on the Definition and Classification of Asthma Exacerbations by Severity: A Move Toward International Standardization

Carmen Pérez Cano, Vicente Plaza, Alicia Padilla‐Galo, Ana María Stok, Francisco Maldonado, Marina Blanco‐Aparicio, José Gregorio Soto-Campos, Ignacio Zabert, Gabriel García, Francisco Javier Alvarez-Gutiérrez, L. B. Caetano, Patricia Fernández
article en

Abstract

Asthma exacerbation is a significant clinical event that occurs with varying severity, yet a set of universally accepted standardized definitions is still needed. The aim of this consensus developed by ALAT and SEPAR was to fill this gap with a validated proposal for classifying asthma exacerbations into levels of severity: non-severe, severe, and very severe. The consensus was based on an in-depth review of the literature conducted by the scientific committee to identify key parameters for each level of severity, including worsening symptoms, respiratory function changes, and the need for specific medical interventions. A total of 67 publications were analyzed to generate a questionnaire on the defining elements of asthma exacerbations, and this was put to the vote. Twenty-eight international experts participated in the validation of characteristics and definitions of exacerbation severity following Delphi methodology. The resulting definitions clearly distinguish non-severe exacerbations (requiring minor adjustments in treatment) from severe exacerbations (requiring more intensive interventions, including longer systemic corticosteroid use or hospitalization) and very severe exacerbations (life-threatening events requiring intensive care). These definitions provide a standardized framework that facilitates comparison between clinical trials and optimizes patient care. This consensus lays the foundation for unifying management criteria in global clinical practice and fostering research on the efficacy of asthma treatments. It also underlines the importance of accurate classification in improving clinical outcomes and reducing the overall burden of disease.

Open Respiratory ArchivesVol. 7(4)
Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (AR), Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (MX), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES), Hospital Universitario Puerto Real (ES), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (ES), Centro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (AR), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (ES), Universidad Nacional del Comahue (AR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR), Centro de Estudios Científicos (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.