Stacked vs. Single Free Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A National Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes

Autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) is a reliable option for reconstruction after mastectomy. In cases where single donor sites do not offer adequate tissue, the use of "stacked" flaps, or multiple free flaps, can be brought together to provide optimal breast volume. This large-scale study aims to compare clinical outcomes, resource utilization, and readmission rates between single and stacked flaps.The National Readmission Database was used to retrospectively identify adult female patients who underwent ABR with free flaps between 2016 and 2020. In this study, free flaps were restricted to nonpedicled types, with latissimus dorsi (LD) and pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps (TRAM) excluded. Patients were categorized based on flap type (single vs. stacked) using relevant International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) procedure codes. Patient demographics, hospital factors, complication rates, and readmission data were analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in postoperative flap complication rates between single and stacked flaps.A total of 52,180 adult females were included for analysis. Of these, 51,140 (<i>n</i> = 98.5%) had single flaps and 783 patients (<i>n</i> = 1.5%) had stacked flaps. Use of stacked flaps was not statistically associated with higher odds of any flap complication (adjusted odds ratios: 1.16, <i>p</i> = 0.46) compared to single flaps. Stacked flaps were associated with longer length of stay and higher hospitalization costs, but there was no significant difference in 30-day readmission compared to the single flap cohort.Our study found similar rates of overall flap complications between the cohorts. Thus, in cases where more tissue is needed or desired, the use of stacked flaps appears to be a safe and feasible option to ABR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2737-5205
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stacked vs. Single Free Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A National Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes

Earl C. Elkins, Peyman Benharash, Nisha J. Gupta, Nikhil Chervu et al.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Stacked vs. Single Free Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A National Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes

Earl C. Elkins, Peyman Benharash, Nisha J. Gupta, Nikhil Chervu, Michael R. DeLong, Alberto Romo Valenzuela, Yasmine Ibrahim, Saad Mallick
article en

Abstract

Autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) is a reliable option for reconstruction after mastectomy. In cases where single donor sites do not offer adequate tissue, the use of "stacked" flaps, or multiple free flaps, can be brought together to provide optimal breast volume. This large-scale study aims to compare clinical outcomes, resource utilization, and readmission rates between single and stacked flaps.The National Readmission Database was used to retrospectively identify adult female patients who underwent ABR with free flaps between 2016 and 2020. In this study, free flaps were restricted to nonpedicled types, with latissimus dorsi (LD) and pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps (TRAM) excluded. Patients were categorized based on flap type (single vs. stacked) using relevant International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) procedure codes. Patient demographics, hospital factors, complication rates, and readmission data were analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in postoperative flap complication rates between single and stacked flaps.A total of 52,180 adult females were included for analysis. Of these, 51,140 (<i>n</i> = 98.5%) had single flaps and 783 patients (<i>n</i> = 1.5%) had stacked flaps. Use of stacked flaps was not statistically associated with higher odds of any flap complication (adjusted odds ratios: 1.16, <i>p</i> = 0.46) compared to single flaps. Stacked flaps were associated with longer length of stay and higher hospitalization costs, but there was no significant difference in 30-day readmission compared to the single flap cohort.Our study found similar rates of overall flap complications between the cohorts. Thus, in cases where more tissue is needed or desired, the use of stacked flaps appears to be a safe and feasible option to ABR.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Georgetown University (US), Core Laboratories (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.