Report from MDE practice: An interview-based evaluation of model-driven engineering uses

In this study, we investigate the usability of Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) through interviews with fifteen practitioners from diverse roles (e.g., developers, researchers, architects) and domains, and with a range of expertise levels across academic and industrial software sectors, capturing in-depth perspectives on its practical application. Participants emphasized MDE's benefits in enhancing project robustness, reliability, development speed, and system organization. However, they also identified challenges such as a steep learning curve, technological constraints, organizational resistance, and a shortage of skilled professionals. To address these issues, participants recommended simplifying tools and language, improving consistency and flexibility, enhancing integration with existing workflows, and raising awareness of MDE. These insights provide valuable guidance for improving MDE usability and encouraging broader MDE adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335461
Primary Topic
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Report from MDE practice: An interview-based evaluation of model-driven engineering uses

Hessa Alfraihi, Kevin Lano
PLoS ONE
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
article

Report from MDE practice: An interview-based evaluation of model-driven engineering uses

Hessa Alfraihi, Kevin Lano
article en

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the usability of Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) through interviews with fifteen practitioners from diverse roles (e.g., developers, researchers, architects) and domains, and with a range of expertise levels across academic and industrial software sectors, capturing in-depth perspectives on its practical application. Participants emphasized MDE's benefits in enhancing project robustness, reliability, development speed, and system organization. However, they also identified challenges such as a steep learning curve, technological constraints, organizational resistance, and a shortage of skilled professionals. To address these issues, participants recommended simplifying tools and language, improving consistency and flexibility, enhancing integration with existing workflows, and raising awareness of MDE. These insights provide valuable guidance for improving MDE usability and encouraging broader MDE adoption.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(11)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Report from MDE practice: An interview-based evaluation of model-driven engineering uses — Hessa Alfraihi, Kevin Lano · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS