Comparing the test performance of dried-blood-spot and plasma HIV recent infection testing samples in a nationally scaled sex worker programme in Zimbabwe
Recency testing can provide strategic insights as to whether a person newly diagnosed with HIV recently acquired their infection or not. To understand potential biases associated with HIV recency testing, we explored the extent sample type influences whether a person is assigned as being recent. Implementing a laboratory-based Recent Infection Testing Algorithm (RITA) across the Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) key populations programme in Zimbabwe between October 2021 and January 2023, we compared plasma-based and dried-bloodspot (DBS) HIV recency samples. Over the study period, 24,976 individual female sex workers HIV tested, of whom 9.5% (2,363/24,979) newly tested HIV positive. Of these 2,363 women, 55.5% (1311/2,363) were offered and gave consent for a sample to be taken for DBS recency and viral load testing, among whom 11.7% (153/1,311) were classified as having a recent infection. A subset of 464 women were offered and consented to paired sample collection, among whom 10.1% (47) and 12.3% (57) of plasma and DBS samples, respectively, were classified as recent. Overall, categorical determination was good, with 97% of results concordant. Of 58 women with paired sample collection who had a test result classified as recent, 46 (79.3%) were concordant recent on both DBS and plasma, with 12 (20.7%) being discordant. Of these 12 women's samples, 11 were deemed long-standing by the plasma assay but recent by the paired DBS, and one deemed long-standing by DBS but recent by the paired plasma sample. On average, plasma samples had a higher normalised optical density than DBS samples (mean difference of 0.53). Depending on use-case and setting, there are trade-offs when considering DBS or plasma-based samples between test performance and ease of implementation. Our data can help inform statistical adjustments to harmonise cut-offs on DBS and plasma assays, thereby improving the use and interpretation of recency assays in population-level HIV surveillance activities.
Authors
- Brian Rice (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-8058)
- Harriet Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4007-7144)
- Gary Murphy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-255X)
- Frances Mary Cowan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3087-4422)
- Owen Mugurungi
- Memory Makamba (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3556-4620)
- Fortunate Machingura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4623-8180)
- Primrose Matambanadzo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-7049)
- Sithembile Musemburi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-8883)
- Sarah Bourdin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9151-1567)
- James Hargreaves (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3509-3572)
- Phillip N. Chida
- Edward Matsikire
- Thomas Chanyowedza
- Panganai Masvikeni
- Leah Gaihai
- J Dirawo
Institutions
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Ministry of Health and Child Welfare (ZW)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Faculty of Public Health (GB)
- Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (ZW)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLOS Global Public Health
- Published
- 2025-11-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003791
- Primary Topic
- HIV Research and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00