Clinical and economic impact of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier screening method compared to targeted NIPT and first-trimester combined testing: A modeling study

Among the strategies evaluated, first-tier GW-NIPT had the greatest diagnostic yield and the lowest cost per diagnosis, improving detection rates and supporting reproductive autonomy at lower costs. Implementation decisions should also consider local pricing, laboratory capacity, and counseling resources. Future research that links screening outcomes to long-term health consequences (e.g., quality-adjusted life years or life-years), healthcare utilization, costs, and psychosocial outcomes will enable formal cost-effectiveness evaluations and support further refinement of prenatal screening policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Medicine
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004790
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and economic impact of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier screening method compared to targeted NIPT and first-trimester combined testing: A modeling study

Lisanne van Prooyen Schuurman, E. Meier, Harry J. de Koning, Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn et al.
2 citations
PLoS Medicine
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
6.99
article

Clinical and economic impact of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier screening method compared to targeted NIPT and first-trimester combined testing: A modeling study

Lisanne van Prooyen Schuurman, E. Meier, Harry J. de Koning, Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn, Robert-Jan H. Galjaard
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Among the strategies evaluated, first-tier GW-NIPT had the greatest diagnostic yield and the lowest cost per diagnosis, improving detection rates and supporting reproductive autonomy at lower costs. Implementation decisions should also consider local pricing, laboratory capacity, and counseling resources. Future research that links screening outcomes to long-term health consequences (e.g., quality-adjusted life years or life-years), healthcare utilization, costs, and psychosocial outcomes will enable formal cost-effectiveness evaluations and support further refinement of prenatal screening policy.

PLoS MedicineVol. 22(11)
Erasmus MC (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
6.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical and economic impact of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier screening method compared to targeted NIPT and first-trimester combined testing: A modeling study — Lisanne van Prooyen Schuurman, E. Meier, et al. · PLoS Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS