Clinical and economic impact of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier screening method compared to targeted NIPT and first-trimester combined testing: A modeling study
Among the strategies evaluated, first-tier GW-NIPT had the greatest diagnostic yield and the lowest cost per diagnosis, improving detection rates and supporting reproductive autonomy at lower costs. Implementation decisions should also consider local pricing, laboratory capacity, and counseling resources. Future research that links screening outcomes to long-term health consequences (e.g., quality-adjusted life years or life-years), healthcare utilization, costs, and psychosocial outcomes will enable formal cost-effectiveness evaluations and support further refinement of prenatal screening policy.
Authors
- Lisanne van Prooyen Schuurman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9971-8359)
- E. Meier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1779-2418)
- Harry J. de Koning (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4682-3646)
- Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-466X)
- Robert-Jan H. Galjaard
Institutions
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS Medicine
- Published
- 2025-11-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004790
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.99
Funders
- Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu