A Conceptual Map for Exploring the Landscape of Large Language Models

Selecting and evaluating the most suitable Large Language Model (LLM) for a given task remains a significant challenge, particularly in domain-specific applications such as healthcare and legal research, which require models to provide transparency regarding training data, task specialization, and compliance with ethical standards. Despite the availability of open-source platforms for sharing models and datasets, challenges persist in accessing critical information. Incomplete metadata and inconsistent documentation hinder efficient model discovery, comparison, and adoption. In this paper, we introduce a simple conceptual map for LLMs, designed to assist researchers and practitioners in understanding the complex landscape of generative models. We provide a rationale for our modeling choices and a comprehensive description of the map in terms of four interconnected entities. Our primary objective is to provide all practitioners in the field — not just developers, but managers, testers, and other people who are part of producing and using technology — a clear terminology for expressing how to address the LLM landscape. A secondary objective is a call on industry stakeholders — including collaborative platforms and model providers—to enhance transparency and reproducibility in LLM research and deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3629334
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Conceptual Map for Exploring the Landscape of Large Language Models

Elena Baralis, Luca Cagliero, Flavio Giobergia, Francesco Pierri et al.
IEEE Access
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

A Conceptual Map for Exploring the Landscape of Large Language Models

Elena Baralis, Luca Cagliero, Flavio Giobergia, Francesco Pierri, Stefano Ceri, Anna Bernasconi, Claudio Savelli
article en

Abstract

Selecting and evaluating the most suitable Large Language Model (LLM) for a given task remains a significant challenge, particularly in domain-specific applications such as healthcare and legal research, which require models to provide transparency regarding training data, task specialization, and compliance with ethical standards. Despite the availability of open-source platforms for sharing models and datasets, challenges persist in accessing critical information. Incomplete metadata and inconsistent documentation hinder efficient model discovery, comparison, and adoption. In this paper, we introduce a simple conceptual map for LLMs, designed to assist researchers and practitioners in understanding the complex landscape of generative models. We provide a rationale for our modeling choices and a comprehensive description of the map in terms of four interconnected entities. Our primary objective is to provide all practitioners in the field — not just developers, but managers, testers, and other people who are part of producing and using technology — a clear terminology for expressing how to address the LLM landscape. A secondary objective is a call on industry stakeholders — including collaborative platforms and model providers—to enhance transparency and reproducibility in LLM research and deployment.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.