Bleeding and thrombotic outcomes with oral anticoagulants in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and venous thromboembolism

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding. We aimed to compare the risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin in patients with IBD and VTE. The study included adults with IBD and VTE who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin. The primary study outcomes were recurrent VTE and a composite of serious bleeding. We used Cox proportional hazard model after propensity score matching to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In a secondary analysis, we compared the risk of bleeding in patients on DOACs with IBD vs patients without IBD. Our matched IBD cohort of patients initiating oral anticoagulants comprised 2174 patients (1087 DOAC users and 1087 warfarin users). After propensity score matching, DOAC use (compared with warfarin) was associated with a lower risk of bleeding (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.85) with no difference in the risk of recurrent VTE (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59-1.15). In the secondary analysis of patients with VTE who received DOACs, there was a twofold increase in the risk of bleeding in patients with IBD compared with those without IBD (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.64-2.41). In patients with IBD and VTE, DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared with warfarin, without a significant difference in the risk of recurrent VTE. However, even with the use of DOACs, patients with IBD were twice as likely to experience serious bleeding as those without IBD, highlighting the importance of close monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Advances
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017617
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bleeding and thrombotic outcomes with oral anticoagulants in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and venous thromboembolism

Ghadeer K. Dawwas, James D. Lewis, Adam C. Cuker
2 citations
Blood Advances
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
3.63
article

Bleeding and thrombotic outcomes with oral anticoagulants in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and venous thromboembolism

Ghadeer K. Dawwas, James D. Lewis, Adam C. Cuker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding. We aimed to compare the risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin in patients with IBD and VTE. The study included adults with IBD and VTE who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin. The primary study outcomes were recurrent VTE and a composite of serious bleeding. We used Cox proportional hazard model after propensity score matching to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In a secondary analysis, we compared the risk of bleeding in patients on DOACs with IBD vs patients without IBD. Our matched IBD cohort of patients initiating oral anticoagulants comprised 2174 patients (1087 DOAC users and 1087 warfarin users). After propensity score matching, DOAC use (compared with warfarin) was associated with a lower risk of bleeding (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.85) with no difference in the risk of recurrent VTE (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59-1.15). In the secondary analysis of patients with VTE who received DOACs, there was a twofold increase in the risk of bleeding in patients with IBD compared with those without IBD (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.64-2.41). In patients with IBD and VTE, DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared with warfarin, without a significant difference in the risk of recurrent VTE. However, even with the use of DOACs, patients with IBD were twice as likely to experience serious bleeding as those without IBD, highlighting the importance of close monitoring.

Blood AdvancesVol. 10(5)
Vanderbilt University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Sanofi, Celgene, Entasis Therapeutics, National Institutes of Health, Samsung, Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.