Multinational assessment of absolute neutrophil counts and white blood cell counts among healthy Duffy-null adults

Laboratory reference intervals must reflect population diversity for accurate medical decisions. The Duffy-null variant lowers absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), but existing dedicated reference intervals are based on a single African American cohort. The impact across other ethnic groups and regions remains unclear, and no white blood cell count (WBC) intervals exist for Duffy-null individuals. This study aimed to establish and compare Duffy-null ANC and WBC reference intervals across 4 continents. A cross-sectional study was conducted assessing healthy Duffy-null individuals from dedicated cohorts (blood donors in Namibia, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom; primary care patients in the United States) and biobanks (participants from the United Kingdom and the United States). Among 8018 participants (880 from dedicated cohorts and 7138 from biobanks), novel ANC and WBC reference intervals were established (Namibia [ANC, 820/μL to 6370/μL; WBC, 2.51 × 109/L to 9.85 × 109/L]; Saudi Arabia [ANC, 1140/μL to 5290/μL; WBC, 3.72 × 109/L to 10.71 × 109/L]; United Kingdom (ANC, 1185/μL to 5462/μL; WBC, 3.1 × 109/L to 8.8 × 109/L]; the United States [ANC, 1210/μL to 5390/μL; WBC, 3.00 × 109/L to 9.66 × 109/L]), with no significant differences between cohorts. Institutional reference intervals misclassified 27.9% (Namibia), 50.9% (Saudi Arabia), 26.0% (United Kingdom), and 21.7% (the United States) as neutropenic. Biobank analyses confirmed no significant difference in ANC between Black and non-Black Duffy-null participants. Duffy-null individuals consistently exhibit lower ANC and WBC across ethnic groups and regions. Current reference intervals overlook this variation, risking misdiagnosis and health inequities. Implementing Duffy-specific reference intervals is essential for equitable and accurate clinical decisions worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2025029359
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Blood disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multinational assessment of absolute neutrophil counts and white blood cell counts among healthy Duffy-null adults

David J. Roberts, Olga Shamardina, María Luisa Russo, Lauren E. Merz et al.
1 citations
Blood
Blood disorders and treatments
1.82
article

Multinational assessment of absolute neutrophil counts and white blood cell counts among healthy Duffy-null adults

David J. Roberts, Olga Shamardina, María Luisa Russo, Lauren E. Merz, Amr J Halawani, Nicholas Gleadall, Israel Chipare, Stephen P. Hibbs, Sophie E. Legge, Geoffrey Fell, Maureen Achebe, Nancy Berliner, Hilary T Charuma, Vanessa Apea, Sara Paparini, Abdulrahman A Alhamzi, Mohammed A Nushaily, Judith M Sinvula, Edwig Shingenge, Mohammed J Alabdly, Michelle Sholzberg, Daniel Dees
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Laboratory reference intervals must reflect population diversity for accurate medical decisions. The Duffy-null variant lowers absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), but existing dedicated reference intervals are based on a single African American cohort. The impact across other ethnic groups and regions remains unclear, and no white blood cell count (WBC) intervals exist for Duffy-null individuals. This study aimed to establish and compare Duffy-null ANC and WBC reference intervals across 4 continents. A cross-sectional study was conducted assessing healthy Duffy-null individuals from dedicated cohorts (blood donors in Namibia, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom; primary care patients in the United States) and biobanks (participants from the United Kingdom and the United States). Among 8018 participants (880 from dedicated cohorts and 7138 from biobanks), novel ANC and WBC reference intervals were established (Namibia [ANC, 820/μL to 6370/μL; WBC, 2.51 × 109/L to 9.85 × 109/L]; Saudi Arabia [ANC, 1140/μL to 5290/μL; WBC, 3.72 × 109/L to 10.71 × 109/L]; United Kingdom (ANC, 1185/μL to 5462/μL; WBC, 3.1 × 109/L to 8.8 × 109/L]; the United States [ANC, 1210/μL to 5390/μL; WBC, 3.00 × 109/L to 9.66 × 109/L]), with no significant differences between cohorts. Institutional reference intervals misclassified 27.9% (Namibia), 50.9% (Saudi Arabia), 26.0% (United Kingdom), and 21.7% (the United States) as neutropenic. Biobank analyses confirmed no significant difference in ANC between Black and non-Black Duffy-null participants. Duffy-null individuals consistently exhibit lower ANC and WBC across ethnic groups and regions. Current reference intervals overlook this variation, risking misdiagnosis and health inequities. Implementing Duffy-specific reference intervals is essential for equitable and accurate clinical decisions worldwide.

BloodVol. 147(3)
Namibia University of Science and Technology (NA), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), St. Michael's Hospital (CA), NHS Blood and Transplant (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Toronto (CA), Umm al-Qura University (SA), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Cambridge School (PT), Bridge University (SS), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Blood Transfusion Service of Namibia (NA), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), King Fahad Central Hospital (SA), Mass General Brigham (US), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Blood disorders and treatments
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.