Facilitating and Hindering Factors in the Implementation of a Care Transition Strategy: Mixed Methods Study

Objective: To identify facilitating and hindering factors for implementing a care transition strategy for adult patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery, within a primary health care (PHC) context, addressing gaps in the literature on implementation challenges and contextual factors influencing such strategies. Methods: This complex mixed methods study combined a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and a qualitative component within an Implementation Research framework. The RCT enrolled adult patients with colorectal cancer, while the qualitative phase included a multilevel sample of participants. Iterative data integration occurred throughout the planning, implementation, and evaluation phases. The intervention was assessed using the RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0, applying descriptive and inferential methods. Results: Our findings revealed that the adoption of the intervention was satisfactory; however, Reach, Efficacy, and Implementation were not achieved. Facilitating factors included recognition of the potential of the care transition strategy to improve patient outcomes, and the intervention’s feasibility, replicability, and low cost. The main hindering factors identified included poor communication between care levels, inadequate material resources, and high workload. Integration of qualitative insights helped explain the limited quantitative impact, highlighting contextual challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: The care transition strategy was well accepted by participants and health care providers, demonstrating potential to strengthen continuity of care between hospital and PHC services. Nonetheless, significant organizational and resource-related barriers hindered its effectiveness. Future studies are required to adapt transitional care models to overcome communication gaps, optimize resource allocation, and enhance implementation in similar settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord7040071
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitating and Hindering Factors in the Implementation of a Care Transition Strategy: Mixed Methods Study

Anthony John Onwuegbuzie, Adriane Cristina Bernat Kolankiewicz, Letícia Flores Trindade, Elisiane Lorenzini et al.
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Facilitating and Hindering Factors in the Implementation of a Care Transition Strategy: Mixed Methods Study

Anthony John Onwuegbuzie, Adriane Cristina Bernat Kolankiewicz, Letícia Flores Trindade, Elisiane Lorenzini, Darlisom Sousa Ferreira, Michelle Mariah Malkiewiez, Ana Esther Pereira de Oliveira, Luana Amaral Alpirez
article en

Abstract

Objective: To identify facilitating and hindering factors for implementing a care transition strategy for adult patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery, within a primary health care (PHC) context, addressing gaps in the literature on implementation challenges and contextual factors influencing such strategies. Methods: This complex mixed methods study combined a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and a qualitative component within an Implementation Research framework. The RCT enrolled adult patients with colorectal cancer, while the qualitative phase included a multilevel sample of participants. Iterative data integration occurred throughout the planning, implementation, and evaluation phases. The intervention was assessed using the RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0, applying descriptive and inferential methods. Results: Our findings revealed that the adoption of the intervention was satisfactory; however, Reach, Efficacy, and Implementation were not achieved. Facilitating factors included recognition of the potential of the care transition strategy to improve patient outcomes, and the intervention’s feasibility, replicability, and low cost. The main hindering factors identified included poor communication between care levels, inadequate material resources, and high workload. Integration of qualitative insights helped explain the limited quantitative impact, highlighting contextual challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: The care transition strategy was well accepted by participants and health care providers, demonstrating potential to strengthen continuity of care between hospital and PHC services. Nonetheless, significant organizational and resource-related barriers hindered its effectiveness. Future studies are required to adapt transitional care models to overcome communication gaps, optimize resource allocation, and enhance implementation in similar settings.

Gastrointestinal DisordersVol. 7(4)
University of Cambridge (GB), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.