The accounting profession and modern slavery regulation through the lens of altruism, egoism and legitimacy

Purpose There is ongoing debate over whether the accounting profession should address social issues such as modern slavery. Some argue that accounting has a responsibility to uphold social values, while others contend that such a responsibility is beyond its scope. Against this backdrop, this study examines the role of the accounting profession in addressing modern slavery. Design/methodology/approach We analyse the submissions made by New Zealand and Australian Big4 accounting firms and professional accounting bodies to the consultation processes for modern slavery legislation conducted between 2017 and 2023. Findings We find that the accounting profession, reflecting altruistic motives, supports the legislation for modern slavery and recommends that regulation focuses on fostering societal values and collaboration with Indigenous people. The profession also recommends that businesses should implement ethical labour practices and provide high-quality disclosures beyond basic compliance. By doing so, the accounting profession expects to maintain moral and cognitive legitimacy. However, speaking on behalf of clients, the profession acts with self-interest. This reflects an egoistic motive, which helps sustain pragmatic legitimacy. Originality/value Our study presents a framework that explains how the accounting profession’s involvement in modern slavery is motivated by both altruistic and egoistic-driven legitimacy-seeking behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Literature
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-04-2024-0068
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The accounting profession and modern slavery regulation through the lens of altruism, egoism and legitimacy

Julia Yonghua Wu, Ahesha Perera, Ahsan Habib, Jude Edeigba
Journal of Accounting Literature
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

The accounting profession and modern slavery regulation through the lens of altruism, egoism and legitimacy

Julia Yonghua Wu, Ahesha Perera, Ahsan Habib, Jude Edeigba
article en

Abstract

Purpose There is ongoing debate over whether the accounting profession should address social issues such as modern slavery. Some argue that accounting has a responsibility to uphold social values, while others contend that such a responsibility is beyond its scope. Against this backdrop, this study examines the role of the accounting profession in addressing modern slavery. Design/methodology/approach We analyse the submissions made by New Zealand and Australian Big4 accounting firms and professional accounting bodies to the consultation processes for modern slavery legislation conducted between 2017 and 2023. Findings We find that the accounting profession, reflecting altruistic motives, supports the legislation for modern slavery and recommends that regulation focuses on fostering societal values and collaboration with Indigenous people. The profession also recommends that businesses should implement ethical labour practices and provide high-quality disclosures beyond basic compliance. By doing so, the accounting profession expects to maintain moral and cognitive legitimacy. However, speaking on behalf of clients, the profession acts with self-interest. This reflects an egoistic motive, which helps sustain pragmatic legitimacy. Originality/value Our study presents a framework that explains how the accounting profession’s involvement in modern slavery is motivated by both altruistic and egoistic-driven legitimacy-seeking behaviour.

Journal of Accounting LiteratureVol. 48(5)
Colorado Mesa University (US), University of Canterbury (NZ), Massey University (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.