‘So be it’: Blanchot's Challenge to Ecocriticism

Maurice Blanchot's ‘The Apocalypse Is Disappointing’ deals with the danger of an atomic war that might encompass the entire world and annihilate human life on the planet. It is in this context that, on the one hand, he defends modern science and its experiments with truth, while on the other hand, he advocates the creation of a global communist society. If scientific experiments cannot be risked without putting humankind at risk and opening up the possibility of humanity perishing, then only the unified collective subject of a global communist society is capable of truly and rationally destroying humanity and the world as a whole. Annihilation is the possible cost to be paid for revolutionary change and the overcoming of social antagonism, just as it is the possible cost for research, for stimulating and satisfying the will to truth and the will to knowledge inherent in human beings. Blanchot sides with Nietzsche and exclaims: ‘So be it!’. Ecocriticism, if it is to make ‘any sense whatsoever’, has no choice but to try and measure up to this double wager.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Literary Review
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/olr.2025.0481
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘So be it’: Blanchot's Challenge to Ecocriticism

Alexander García Düttmann
Oxford Literary Review
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

‘So be it’: Blanchot's Challenge to Ecocriticism

Alexander García Düttmann
article en

Abstract

Maurice Blanchot's ‘The Apocalypse Is Disappointing’ deals with the danger of an atomic war that might encompass the entire world and annihilate human life on the planet. It is in this context that, on the one hand, he defends modern science and its experiments with truth, while on the other hand, he advocates the creation of a global communist society. If scientific experiments cannot be risked without putting humankind at risk and opening up the possibility of humanity perishing, then only the unified collective subject of a global communist society is capable of truly and rationally destroying humanity and the world as a whole. Annihilation is the possible cost to be paid for revolutionary change and the overcoming of social antagonism, just as it is the possible cost for research, for stimulating and satisfying the will to truth and the will to knowledge inherent in human beings. Blanchot sides with Nietzsche and exclaims: ‘So be it!’. Ecocriticism, if it is to make ‘any sense whatsoever’, has no choice but to try and measure up to this double wager.

Oxford Literary ReviewVol. 47(2)
Berlin University of the Arts (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.