Outcomes from Referral to Transplant for Patients with MASLD: A California Liver Network Study

<b>Background:</b> Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is becoming a leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States. In this growing recipient population, the combined effects of underlying liver disease etiology and associated comorbidities on the evaluation pathway to transplantation warrant closer examination of patient outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed adult liver transplant referrals (<i>n</i> = 9981) from the California Liver Network, a multi-center retrospective cohort spanning six high-volume California transplant centers between 2018 and 2020. A total of 6709 patients who underwent formal evaluation were included. Patients were stratified by MASLD vs. non-MASLD etiology and compared for demographics, comorbidities, transplant evaluation timelines, listing rates, and outcomes. <b>Results:</b> MASLD patients (<i>n</i> = 1477) were older, had higher BMI, and had greater prevalence of metabolic comorbidities than non-MASLD patients (<i>n</i> = 5232; <i>p</i> < 0.001 for all). Compared to non-MASLD candidates, MASLD patients were more likely to be waitlisted (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.33-1.74; <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, MASLD and non-MASLD patients had no statistically significant difference in the rate of transplant (<i>p</i> = 0.182), with clinically similar but statistically inferior post-transplant survival outcomes at 5 years post-transplant (88% vs. 83%; <i>p</i> = 0.014). Competing-risk analysis showed that MASLD candidates had higher cumulative incidence of death on the waitlist (<i>p</i> < 0.001), although MASLD was not independently associated with waitlist mortality when adjusting for covariates (<i>p</i> = 0.300). MASLD patients demonstrated increased mortality following waitlist removal (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.14-2.35; <i>p</i> = 0.008), primarily among those removed for clinical deterioration (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.01-2.23; <i>p</i> = 0.044). <b>Conclusions:</b> MASLD patients face unique challenges in liver transplant evaluation. MASLD patients are associated with higher comorbidities, increased incidence of waitlist mortality, and significantly higher mortality rate following waitlist removal. However, transplantation provides significant survival benefit with comparable outcomes to non-MASLD recipients; thus, early access to transplant may optimize outcomes for MASLD liver transplant candidates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217841
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes from Referral to Transplant for Patients with MASLD: A California Liver Network Study

Alexander Kuo, Hirsh D. Trivedi, Jasleen Singh, Irine Vodkin et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Outcomes from Referral to Transplant for Patients with MASLD: A California Liver Network Study

Alexander Kuo, Hirsh D. Trivedi, Jasleen Singh, Irine Vodkin, Justin A. Steggerda, Chris E. Freise, Veeral Ajmera, Mignote Yilma, Allison J. Kwong, Michael Luu, Aarshi Vipani, Monica A. Tincopa, Tiffany Y. Lim, Ryutaro Hirose, Steven A. Wisel, Kali Zhou, Neil Mehta, Michie Adjei
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is becoming a leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States. In this growing recipient population, the combined effects of underlying liver disease etiology and associated comorbidities on the evaluation pathway to transplantation warrant closer examination of patient outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed adult liver transplant referrals (<i>n</i> = 9981) from the California Liver Network, a multi-center retrospective cohort spanning six high-volume California transplant centers between 2018 and 2020. A total of 6709 patients who underwent formal evaluation were included. Patients were stratified by MASLD vs. non-MASLD etiology and compared for demographics, comorbidities, transplant evaluation timelines, listing rates, and outcomes. <b>Results:</b> MASLD patients (<i>n</i> = 1477) were older, had higher BMI, and had greater prevalence of metabolic comorbidities than non-MASLD patients (<i>n</i> = 5232; <i>p</i> < 0.001 for all). Compared to non-MASLD candidates, MASLD patients were more likely to be waitlisted (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.33-1.74; <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, MASLD and non-MASLD patients had no statistically significant difference in the rate of transplant (<i>p</i> = 0.182), with clinically similar but statistically inferior post-transplant survival outcomes at 5 years post-transplant (88% vs. 83%; <i>p</i> = 0.014). Competing-risk analysis showed that MASLD candidates had higher cumulative incidence of death on the waitlist (<i>p</i> < 0.001), although MASLD was not independently associated with waitlist mortality when adjusting for covariates (<i>p</i> = 0.300). MASLD patients demonstrated increased mortality following waitlist removal (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.14-2.35; <i>p</i> = 0.008), primarily among those removed for clinical deterioration (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.01-2.23; <i>p</i> = 0.044). <b>Conclusions:</b> MASLD patients face unique challenges in liver transplant evaluation. MASLD patients are associated with higher comorbidities, increased incidence of waitlist mortality, and significantly higher mortality rate following waitlist removal. However, transplantation provides significant survival benefit with comparable outcomes to non-MASLD recipients; thus, early access to transplant may optimize outcomes for MASLD liver transplant candidates.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(21)
University of Southern California (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University of San Diego (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Palo Alto University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.