Evaluating clinical AI summaries with large language models as judges

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) contain vast clinical data that are difficult for providers to synthesize. Generative AI with Large Language Models (LLMs) can summarize records to reduce cognitive burden, but ensuring accuracy requires reliable evaluation. Human review is the gold standard but is costly and slow. To address this, we introduce and validate an automated LLM-based method to assess real-world EHR multi-document summaries. Benchmarking against the validated Provider Documentation Summarization Quality Instrument (PDSQI), our LLM-as-a-Judge framework demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability with human evaluators. GPT-o3-mini achieved an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.818 (95% CI 0.772-0.854), a median score difference of 0 from humans, and completed evaluations in 22 seconds. Overall, reasoning models excelled in inter-rater reliability, particularly for evaluations requiring advanced reasoning and domain expertise, outperforming non-reasoning, task-trained, and multi-agent approaches. By automating high-quality evaluations, a medical LLM-as-a-Judge provides a scalable, efficient way to identify accurate, safe AI-generated clinical summaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02005-2
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating clinical AI summaries with large language models as judges

Brian W. Patterson, Nicholas Pellegrino, Anoop Mayampurath, Frank Liao et al.
12 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Machine Learning in Healthcare
29.77
article

Evaluating clinical AI summaries with large language models as judges

Brian W. Patterson, Nicholas Pellegrino, Anoop Mayampurath, Frank Liao, Graham Wills, Madeline Oguss, John Caskey, Dmitriy Dligach, Majid Afshar, Matthew M. Churpek, Emma Croxford, Elliot First, Guanhua Chen, Yanjun Gao, Cherodeep Goswami, Karen K. Wong, Miranda Schnier
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) contain vast clinical data that are difficult for providers to synthesize. Generative AI with Large Language Models (LLMs) can summarize records to reduce cognitive burden, but ensuring accuracy requires reliable evaluation. Human review is the gold standard but is costly and slow. To address this, we introduce and validate an automated LLM-based method to assess real-world EHR multi-document summaries. Benchmarking against the validated Provider Documentation Summarization Quality Instrument (PDSQI), our LLM-as-a-Judge framework demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability with human evaluators. GPT-o3-mini achieved an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.818 (95% CI 0.772-0.854), a median score difference of 0 from humans, and completed evaluations in 22 seconds. Overall, reasoning models excelled in inter-rater reliability, particularly for evaluations requiring advanced reasoning and domain expertise, outperforming non-reasoning, task-trained, and multi-agent approaches. By automating high-quality evaluations, a medical LLM-as-a-Judge provides a scalable, efficient way to identify accurate, safe AI-generated clinical summaries.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), University of Wisconsin Health (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Epic Systems (United States) (US)
U.S. National Library of Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
29.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.