Fair human-centric image dataset for ethical AI benchmarking

Computer vision is central to many artificial intelligence (AI) applications, from autonomous vehicles to consumer devices. However, the data behind such technical innovations are often collected with insufficient consideration of ethical concerns<sup>1-3</sup>. This has led to a reliance on datasets that lack diversity, perpetuate biases and are collected without the consent of data rights holders. These datasets compromise the fairness and accuracy of AI models and disenfranchise stakeholders<sup>4-8</sup>. Although awareness of the problems of bias in computer vision technologies, particularly facial recognition, has become widespread<sup>9</sup>, the field lacks publicly available, consensually collected datasets for evaluating bias for most tasks<sup>3,10,11</sup>. In response, we introduce the Fair Human-Centric Image Benchmark (FHIBE, pronounced 'Feebee'), a publicly available human image dataset implementing best practices for consent, privacy, compensation, safety, diversity and utility. FHIBE can be used responsibly as a fairness evaluation dataset for many human-centric computer vision tasks, including pose estimation, person segmentation, face detection and verification, and visual question answering. By leveraging comprehensive annotations capturing demographic and physical attributes, environmental factors, instrument and pixel-level annotations, FHIBE can identify a wide variety of biases. The annotations also enable more nuanced and granular bias diagnoses, enabling practitioners to better understand sources of bias and mitigate potential downstream harms. FHIBE therefore represents an important step forward towards trustworthy AI, raising the bar for fairness benchmarks and providing a road map for responsible data curation in AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09716-2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair human-centric image dataset for ethical AI benchmarking

Peter Stone, Julienne LaChance, Peter R. Wurman, Mircea Cimpoi et al.
3 citations
Nature
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
article

Fair human-centric image dataset for ethical AI benchmarking

Peter Stone, Julienne LaChance, Peter R. Wurman, Mircea Cimpoi, Victoria Matthews, Alireza Abedi, Alice Xiang, Yunhao Ba, Linxia Gong, Austin Hoag, Wiebke Hutiri, Orestis Papakyriakopoulos, Shruti Nagpal, Michael Spranger, Dora Zhao, Apostolos Modas, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jerone T. A. Andrews, Hiroaki Kitano, Jinru Xue, R. D. Bourke, William Thong, Tiffany Georgievski, Aida Rahmattalabbi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Computer vision is central to many artificial intelligence (AI) applications, from autonomous vehicles to consumer devices. However, the data behind such technical innovations are often collected with insufficient consideration of ethical concerns<sup>1-3</sup>. This has led to a reliance on datasets that lack diversity, perpetuate biases and are collected without the consent of data rights holders. These datasets compromise the fairness and accuracy of AI models and disenfranchise stakeholders<sup>4-8</sup>. Although awareness of the problems of bias in computer vision technologies, particularly facial recognition, has become widespread<sup>9</sup>, the field lacks publicly available, consensually collected datasets for evaluating bias for most tasks<sup>3,10,11</sup>. In response, we introduce the Fair Human-Centric Image Benchmark (FHIBE, pronounced 'Feebee'), a publicly available human image dataset implementing best practices for consent, privacy, compensation, safety, diversity and utility. FHIBE can be used responsibly as a fairness evaluation dataset for many human-centric computer vision tasks, including pose estimation, person segmentation, face detection and verification, and visual question answering. By leveraging comprehensive annotations capturing demographic and physical attributes, environmental factors, instrument and pixel-level annotations, FHIBE can identify a wide variety of biases. The annotations also enable more nuanced and granular bias diagnoses, enabling practitioners to better understand sources of bias and mitigate potential downstream harms. FHIBE therefore represents an important step forward towards trustworthy AI, raising the bar for fairness benchmarks and providing a road map for responsible data curation in AI.

NatureVol. 648(8092)
Sony Corporation (United States) (US), Sony Computer Science Laboratories (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.