Types and Mechanisms of Government Water–Environment Governance: A Comparative Analysis of 28 Counties and Districts in Zhejiang

Developing countries face the dilemma of balancing economic development with the governance of the water environment. In the 21st century, water environment governance has become a core theme in Chinese society, prompting governments at all levels to introduce numerous policies in this area. However, the effectiveness of governance varies widely across regions. To address the shortcomings of existing research, which often adopts overly simplistic perspectives and lacks explanatory power, this study integrates previous findings on water environment governance, drawing on theories such as structuration and policy implementation to construct an institutional-actor analytical framework. Through a qualitative comparative analysis of the “Five-Water Co-Governance” initiative in 28 counties in Zhejiang, this study identifies four distinct configurations leading to different governance outcomes: the strong upper-pressure and command-dominated type, the strong target-pressure and market-dominated type, the weak-pressure and command-market hybrid type, and the weak-pressure and command-market hybrid type. The revelation of these diverse governance types deepens the understanding of causal pathways in environmental governance and provides valuable insights into water environment governance practices in developing countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17213171
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Types and Mechanisms of Government Water–Environment Governance: A Comparative Analysis of 28 Counties and Districts in Zhejiang

Fan Liao, Quan Fang, Yuelong Su
Water
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Types and Mechanisms of Government Water–Environment Governance: A Comparative Analysis of 28 Counties and Districts in Zhejiang

Fan Liao, Quan Fang, Yuelong Su
article en

Abstract

Developing countries face the dilemma of balancing economic development with the governance of the water environment. In the 21st century, water environment governance has become a core theme in Chinese society, prompting governments at all levels to introduce numerous policies in this area. However, the effectiveness of governance varies widely across regions. To address the shortcomings of existing research, which often adopts overly simplistic perspectives and lacks explanatory power, this study integrates previous findings on water environment governance, drawing on theories such as structuration and policy implementation to construct an institutional-actor analytical framework. Through a qualitative comparative analysis of the “Five-Water Co-Governance” initiative in 28 counties in Zhejiang, this study identifies four distinct configurations leading to different governance outcomes: the strong upper-pressure and command-dominated type, the strong target-pressure and market-dominated type, the weak-pressure and command-market hybrid type, and the weak-pressure and command-market hybrid type. The revelation of these diverse governance types deepens the understanding of causal pathways in environmental governance and provides valuable insights into water environment governance practices in developing countries.

WaterVol. 17(21)
Huazhong Agricultural University (CN), Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN), Nanjing University of Science and Technology ZiJin College, Nanjing University (CN)
Government of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Types and Mechanisms of Government Water–Environment Governance: A Comparative Analysis of 28 Counties and Districts in Zhejiang — Fan Liao, Quan Fang, et al. · Water (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS