All-optical magnetization switching of GdFe by double-pulse laser excitation

The tremendous interest in the technology and underlying physics of all-optical switching of magnetization brings up the question of how fast the switching can occur and how high the frequency of writing the data with ultrafast laser pulses can be. To answer this question, we excited a GdFe ferrimagnetic alloy, the magnetization of which can be reversed by single laser pulses, a phenomenon known as toggle switching, by two pulses with a certain time delay in between. Using photoemission electron microscopy and Kerr microscopy for magnetic domain imaging, we explore the effects of varying fluences of the first and second pulse as well as the time delay between the two pulses. Our results show that when the fluence of the first pulse is adjusted just above the threshold of single-pulse switching, a second pulse with about <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mn>60</a:mn> <a:mspace width="0.16em"/> <a:mo>%</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:math> of the fluence of the first pulse, arriving only <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mn>3</c:mn> <c:mspace width="0.16em"/> <c:mi mathvariant="normal">p</c:mi> <c:mi mathvariant="normal">s</c:mi> </c:mrow> </c:math> later, switches the magnetization back. This reswitching persists up to about <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:mrow> <g:mn>40</g:mn> <g:mspace width="0.16em"/> <g:mi mathvariant="normal">p</g:mi> <g:mi mathvariant="normal">s</g:mi> </g:mrow> </g:math> pulse separation. We interpret the latter as the time required for the sample to cool down and remagnetize after the first pulse. For shorter time delays below about <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <k:mrow> <k:mn>2</k:mn> <k:mspace width="0.16em"/> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">p</k:mi> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">s</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:math> , no reswitching occurs. However, the effect of the two pulses adds up, enabling switching for fluences of both pulses below the threshold for single-pulse switching. Atomistic spin dynamics simulations are used to model the experimental data, successfully confirming our results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/h8j7-4f2z
Primary Topic
Magnetic properties of thin films
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

All-optical magnetization switching of GdFe by double-pulse laser excitation

Clemens von Korff Schmising, Sebastien E. Hadjadj, Mario Fix, Sangeeta Thakur et al.
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Magnetic properties of thin films
article

All-optical magnetization switching of GdFe by double-pulse laser excitation

Clemens von Korff Schmising, Sebastien E. Hadjadj, Mario Fix, Sangeeta Thakur, Unai Atxitia, Felix Steinbach, M. Albrecht, José Miguel Lendínez, Jendrik Gördes, Chowdhury S. Awsaf, W. Kuch, Rahil Hosseinifar, Florian Kronast, Ivar Kumberg
article en

Abstract

The tremendous interest in the technology and underlying physics of all-optical switching of magnetization brings up the question of how fast the switching can occur and how high the frequency of writing the data with ultrafast laser pulses can be. To answer this question, we excited a GdFe ferrimagnetic alloy, the magnetization of which can be reversed by single laser pulses, a phenomenon known as toggle switching, by two pulses with a certain time delay in between. Using photoemission electron microscopy and Kerr microscopy for magnetic domain imaging, we explore the effects of varying fluences of the first and second pulse as well as the time delay between the two pulses. Our results show that when the fluence of the first pulse is adjusted just above the threshold of single-pulse switching, a second pulse with about <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mn>60</a:mn> <a:mspace width="0.16em"/> <a:mo>%</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:math> of the fluence of the first pulse, arriving only <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mn>3</c:mn> <c:mspace width="0.16em"/> <c:mi mathvariant="normal">p</c:mi> <c:mi mathvariant="normal">s</c:mi> </c:mrow> </c:math> later, switches the magnetization back. This reswitching persists up to about <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:mrow> <g:mn>40</g:mn> <g:mspace width="0.16em"/> <g:mi mathvariant="normal">p</g:mi> <g:mi mathvariant="normal">s</g:mi> </g:mrow> </g:math> pulse separation. We interpret the latter as the time required for the sample to cool down and remagnetize after the first pulse. For shorter time delays below about <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <k:mrow> <k:mn>2</k:mn> <k:mspace width="0.16em"/> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">p</k:mi> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">s</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:math> , no reswitching occurs. However, the effect of the two pulses adds up, enabling switching for fluences of both pulses below the threshold for single-pulse switching. Atomistic spin dynamics simulations are used to model the experimental data, successfully confirming our results.

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 112(17)
University of Augsburg (DE), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (DE), Max-Born-Institute for Nonlinear Optics and Short Pulse Spectroscopy (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Magnetic properties of thin films
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.