Predicting interface structure using the minima hopping method

We adapt the minima hopping method (MHM) to the problem of interfacial structure prediction and apply it to study a canonical problem, the tilt grain boundaries in ${\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3}$. Our method employs a hybrid approach by first exploring the potential energy surface (PES) of different grain boundary samplings with an empirical force field, among which the fifteen candidates with lower energies are then refined using ab initio density functional theory (DFT) calculations. During the exploratory stage, we bias the search using a local order parameter to primarily sample various reconstructions in the vicinity of the interface, while preserving the crystallinity of the bulk regions. We further enhance the search by incorporating initial structures with rigid body displacements to account for translational variations between bulk phases, enabling the MHM to effectively generate both stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric ${\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3} \mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}3$(111)[110] and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}3$(112)[110] grain boundaries. From an algorithmic standpoint, MHM outperforms earlier studies based on genetic algorithms (GA) by identifying more stable interfacial structures of several ${\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3}$ grain boundaries. The performance of the present implementation of the MHM approach is primarily limited by exploring an approximate description of the PES with a rather simple Buckingham potential. This limitation leads to variations in performance when compared to approaches utilizing more advanced surrogate PES models, such as direct DFT-PES sampling or GA with the embedded atom method (EAM). Despite the present limitations, the MHM approach is able to yield interfacial structures with comparable or lower interfacial energies in specific cases, such as $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}3$(111)[110] $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}=1,\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.5$ and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}3$(112)[110] $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1,\ensuremath{-}2$, underscoring the robustness of the MHM approach even with a simple approximation of the DFT PES. The MHM interfacial structure prediction method thus offers an efficient approach to understanding the grain boundaries and heterointerfaces at the atomic scale, providing an important prerequisite for effective materials design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Materials
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/zg25-qf5p
Primary Topic
Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting interface structure using the minima hopping method

Shane Patel, C.C. Chou, Maximilian Amsler, Chris M. Wolverton
Physical Review Materials
Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
article

Predicting interface structure using the minima hopping method

Shane Patel, C.C. Chou, Maximilian Amsler, Chris M. Wolverton
article en

Abstract

We adapt the minima hopping method (MHM) to the problem of interfacial structure prediction and apply it to study a canonical problem, the tilt grain boundaries in ${\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3}$. Our method employs a hybrid approach by first exploring the potential energy surface (PES) of different grain boundary samplings with an empirical force field, among which the fifteen candidates with lower energies are then refined using ab initio density functional theory (DFT) calculations. During the exploratory stage, we bias the search using a local order parameter to primarily sample various reconstructions in the vicinity of the interface, while preserving the crystallinity of the bulk regions. We further enhance the search by incorporating initial structures with rigid body displacements to account for translational variations between bulk phases, enabling the MHM to effectively generate both stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric ${\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3} \mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}3$(111)[110] and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}3$(112)[110] grain boundaries. From an algorithmic standpoint, MHM outperforms earlier studies based on genetic algorithms (GA) by identifying more stable interfacial structures of several ${\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3}$ grain boundaries. The performance of the present implementation of the MHM approach is primarily limited by exploring an approximate description of the PES with a rather simple Buckingham potential. This limitation leads to variations in performance when compared to approaches utilizing more advanced surrogate PES models, such as direct DFT-PES sampling or GA with the embedded atom method (EAM). Despite the present limitations, the MHM approach is able to yield interfacial structures with comparable or lower interfacial energies in specific cases, such as $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}3$(111)[110] $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}=1,\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.5$ and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}3$(112)[110] $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1,\ensuremath{-}2$, underscoring the robustness of the MHM approach even with a simple approximation of the DFT PES. The MHM interfacial structure prediction method thus offers an efficient approach to understanding the grain boundaries and heterointerfaces at the atomic scale, providing an important prerequisite for effective materials design.

Physical Review MaterialsVol. 9(11)
Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.