Do We Trust Patients in Pain? What Would Happen If We Did?

<b>SYNOPSIS:</b> This viewpoint explores clinical and lived experience perspectives of the clinical care environment. Through the lens of trust, we explore what people who have chronic pain experience in the clinical care environment. Trust is integral to the therapeutic relationship, yet most literature only considers whether patients trust clinicians-not if clinicians trust patients. The biomedical metanarrative prioritizes information gathered by clinicians or through tests, which is perceived as "objective," over patients' lived experiences and expertise, which are perceived "subjective." This can lead to implicit biases and judgments about patient behavior that create distrust and missed opportunities for health. What would happen if, instead, clinicians started from a place of trusting people with pain? By trusting patients with pain as honest and knowledgeable experts in their health and well-being, clinicians can learn how to best support health and recovery. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2026;56(1):1-3. Epub 5 November 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13725</i>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13725
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do We Trust Patients in Pain? What Would Happen If We Did?

Ben Darlow, Joletta Beltona
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Do We Trust Patients in Pain? What Would Happen If We Did?

Ben Darlow, Joletta Beltona
article en

Abstract

<b>SYNOPSIS:</b> This viewpoint explores clinical and lived experience perspectives of the clinical care environment. Through the lens of trust, we explore what people who have chronic pain experience in the clinical care environment. Trust is integral to the therapeutic relationship, yet most literature only considers whether patients trust clinicians-not if clinicians trust patients. The biomedical metanarrative prioritizes information gathered by clinicians or through tests, which is perceived as "objective," over patients' lived experiences and expertise, which are perceived "subjective." This can lead to implicit biases and judgments about patient behavior that create distrust and missed opportunities for health. What would happen if, instead, clinicians started from a place of trusting people with pain? By trusting patients with pain as honest and knowledgeable experts in their health and well-being, clinicians can learn how to best support health and recovery. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2026;56(1):1-3. Epub 5 November 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13725</i>.

Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical TherapyVol. 56(1)
Patient Advocate Foundation (US), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do We Trust Patients in Pain? What Would Happen If We Did? — Ben Darlow, Joletta Beltona · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS