Climate Change and Pandemics – Co-Producing Crises: How can Bioethics be Enriched by Critical Forms of Scholarship, Histories, and Theories?

<ns3:p>Bioethics has become an increasingly influential discipline in shaping global health interventions. This is partly because bioethics can establish practical ethical guidelines by combining normative and empirical approaches. However, bioethics scholars have also criticised its limited scope, emphasising the need to re-centre the inherent interconnection between ethics and politics. The climate emergency and pandemics, as crises that coexist and disproportionately affect the global South, compel us to consider these critiques of bioethics. Outside of bioethics, other academic disciplines have produced important critiques of global health, often drawing on critical social theories and methods. While some approaches draw on such critical scholarship, these critiques often remain separate from mainstream bioethics. This raises significant questions: How could bioethics be informed by critical approaches? How could bioethical approaches not only be strengthened to guide current research but also set the moral and ethical trajectory of research and services regarding pandemics and the climate crisis, thus making bioethics more robust and relevant? Drawing on insights from an interdisciplinary engagement with scholars working across pandemics, climate change, and bioethics—predominantly voices from the global South—we develop a critical approach for reimagining bioethics in the context of intersecting global crises. We emphasise the distinction between bioethics and more critical scholarly approaches, propose ways to strengthen bioethics by drawing on more critical perspectives, and suggest ways to integrate critical scholarship into bioethical frameworks.</ns3:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.24929.1
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Change and Pandemics – Co-Producing Crises: How can Bioethics be Enriched by Critical Forms of Scholarship, Histories, and Theories?

Donna Andrews, Marlyn C. Faure
Wellcome Open Research
Ethics in medical practice
article

Climate Change and Pandemics – Co-Producing Crises: How can Bioethics be Enriched by Critical Forms of Scholarship, Histories, and Theories?

Donna Andrews, Marlyn C. Faure
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Bioethics has become an increasingly influential discipline in shaping global health interventions. This is partly because bioethics can establish practical ethical guidelines by combining normative and empirical approaches. However, bioethics scholars have also criticised its limited scope, emphasising the need to re-centre the inherent interconnection between ethics and politics. The climate emergency and pandemics, as crises that coexist and disproportionately affect the global South, compel us to consider these critiques of bioethics. Outside of bioethics, other academic disciplines have produced important critiques of global health, often drawing on critical social theories and methods. While some approaches draw on such critical scholarship, these critiques often remain separate from mainstream bioethics. This raises significant questions: How could bioethics be informed by critical approaches? How could bioethical approaches not only be strengthened to guide current research but also set the moral and ethical trajectory of research and services regarding pandemics and the climate crisis, thus making bioethics more robust and relevant? Drawing on insights from an interdisciplinary engagement with scholars working across pandemics, climate change, and bioethics—predominantly voices from the global South—we develop a critical approach for reimagining bioethics in the context of intersecting global crises. We emphasise the distinction between bioethics and more critical scholarly approaches, propose ways to strengthen bioethics by drawing on more critical perspectives, and suggest ways to integrate critical scholarship into bioethical frameworks.</ns3:p>

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 10
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.