Restoration of ecological interactions: The influence of site and landscape factors

Restoration has been extensively used in agricultural landscapes as a mitigation measure to reduce biodiversity loss in response to historic habitat destruction. Trophic interactions between insects and plants underpin key ecosystem processes and contribute to system robustness, which is a critical outcome for habitat restoration. We evaluate how restoration age, site size and landscape proximity to similar habitats impact the re-establishment of trophic linkages between empirically measured grassland plant-pollinator (60 sites; 1–76 years) and woodland plant-herbivore networks (60 sites; 13–67 years). In each case, sites were selected along a chronosequence with the goal of maximising variation along these temporal and spatial gradients. For both grassland and woodlands, older and larger sites typically support higher levels of connectance, nestedness and generality of the networks. In contrast, landscape proximity promotes these metrics for woodland webs but has the reverse effect for grassland webs. The similarities show common characteristics of community trophic re-establishment in response to local environmental drivers for these different ecosystems. Focusing on interactions rather than species identity highlights opportunities for targeted policies to restore ecosystem function in wider agricultural landscapes; for example, through increasing site size as well as the need for continuity of older sites. • Habitat restoration is used to support biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. • Species-rich grasslands and woodlands are widely used to achieve this goal. • Re-establishment of insect-plant interactions underpins successful restoration. • Habitat age and size have largely consistent effects on trophic interactions. • The effect of landscape differs between grasslands and woodlands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.110060
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restoration of ecological interactions: The influence of site and landscape factors

S. l. Rogerson, Molly M. Freeman, Kevin Watts, Jeffrey R. Harris et al.
1 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Plant and animal studies
3.03
article

Restoration of ecological interactions: The influence of site and landscape factors

S. l. Rogerson, Molly M. Freeman, Kevin Watts, Jeffrey R. Harris, Éric Waddell, Raymond J. Barnett, Elisa Fuentes‐Montemayor, Kyungseo Park, James M. Bullock, Matthew Guy, Ben A. Woodcock, Maico Weites, A. Opris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Restoration has been extensively used in agricultural landscapes as a mitigation measure to reduce biodiversity loss in response to historic habitat destruction. Trophic interactions between insects and plants underpin key ecosystem processes and contribute to system robustness, which is a critical outcome for habitat restoration. We evaluate how restoration age, site size and landscape proximity to similar habitats impact the re-establishment of trophic linkages between empirically measured grassland plant-pollinator (60 sites; 1–76 years) and woodland plant-herbivore networks (60 sites; 13–67 years). In each case, sites were selected along a chronosequence with the goal of maximising variation along these temporal and spatial gradients. For both grassland and woodlands, older and larger sites typically support higher levels of connectance, nestedness and generality of the networks. In contrast, landscape proximity promotes these metrics for woodland webs but has the reverse effect for grassland webs. The similarities show common characteristics of community trophic re-establishment in response to local environmental drivers for these different ecosystems. Focusing on interactions rather than species identity highlights opportunities for targeted policies to restore ecosystem function in wider agricultural landscapes; for example, through increasing site size as well as the need for continuity of older sites. • Habitat restoration is used to support biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. • Species-rich grasslands and woodlands are widely used to achieve this goal. • Re-establishment of insect-plant interactions underpins successful restoration. • Habitat age and size have largely consistent effects on trophic interactions. • The effect of landscape differs between grasslands and woodlands.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 397
University of Stirling (GB), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Forest Research (GB), Cranfield University (GB)
Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Plant and animal studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.