Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of Long-Read Metagenomic Sequencing Compared to Culture and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Detection of Bovine Respiratory Bacteria and Indicators of Antimicrobial Resistance

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Long-read metagenomic sequencing can detect bacteria and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) from bovine respiratory samples, providing an alternative to culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (C/S). This study applied Bayesian latent class models (BLCMs) to estimate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of long-read metagenomic sequencing compared to C/S for detecting <i>Mannheimia haemolytica</i>, <i>Pasteurella multocida</i>, and <i>Histophilus somni</i>, as well as associated macrolide and tetracycline resistance potential. <b>Methods:</b> Deep nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from fall-placed feedlot calves at arrival, 13, and 36 days on feed across two years and two metaphylaxis protocols. Samples underwent C/S and long-read metagenomic sequencing. BLCMs were used to estimate Se and Sp for the detection of bacteria and potential for antimicrobial resistance (AMR). <b>Results:</b> Se and Sp for detecting respiratory bacteria by metagenomics were not significantly different than culture, with four exceptions. For the 2020 samples, Se for <i>M. haemolytica</i> was lower than culture, and Sp for <i>H. somni</i> was lower, while in both 2020 and 2021 samples, Se for <i>P. multocida</i> was higher for metagenomics than culture. The estimated Se and Sp of metagenomics for the detection of <i>msrE-mphE</i>, <i>EstT</i>, and <i>tet(H)</i> within bacterial reads were either not significantly different or were lower than AST, with Sp > 95% with one exception. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provided BLCM-based estimates of clinical Se and Sp of metagenomics and C/S without assuming a gold standard in a large pen research setting. These findings demonstrate the potential of long-read metagenomics to support bovine respiratory disease diagnostics, AMR surveillance, and antimicrobial stewardship in feedlot cattle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14111114
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of Long-Read Metagenomic Sequencing Compared to Culture and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Detection of Bovine Respiratory Bacteria and Indicators of Antimicrobial Resistance

Lianne McLeod, Zhijian Chai, John Campbell, Paul Stothard et al.
1 citations
Antibiotics
Microbial infections and disease research
1.18
article

Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of Long-Read Metagenomic Sequencing Compared to Culture and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Detection of Bovine Respiratory Bacteria and Indicators of Antimicrobial Resistance

Lianne McLeod, Zhijian Chai, John Campbell, Paul Stothard, Matthew G. Links, Cheryl Lynne Waldner, Erin McCarthy, Stacey Lacoste, Simon J. G. Otto, Jennifer N. Abi Younes, Emily K. Herman, Sheryl Gow
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Long-read metagenomic sequencing can detect bacteria and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) from bovine respiratory samples, providing an alternative to culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (C/S). This study applied Bayesian latent class models (BLCMs) to estimate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of long-read metagenomic sequencing compared to C/S for detecting <i>Mannheimia haemolytica</i>, <i>Pasteurella multocida</i>, and <i>Histophilus somni</i>, as well as associated macrolide and tetracycline resistance potential. <b>Methods:</b> Deep nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from fall-placed feedlot calves at arrival, 13, and 36 days on feed across two years and two metaphylaxis protocols. Samples underwent C/S and long-read metagenomic sequencing. BLCMs were used to estimate Se and Sp for the detection of bacteria and potential for antimicrobial resistance (AMR). <b>Results:</b> Se and Sp for detecting respiratory bacteria by metagenomics were not significantly different than culture, with four exceptions. For the 2020 samples, Se for <i>M. haemolytica</i> was lower than culture, and Sp for <i>H. somni</i> was lower, while in both 2020 and 2021 samples, Se for <i>P. multocida</i> was higher for metagenomics than culture. The estimated Se and Sp of metagenomics for the detection of <i>msrE-mphE</i>, <i>EstT</i>, and <i>tet(H)</i> within bacterial reads were either not significantly different or were lower than AST, with Sp > 95% with one exception. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provided BLCM-based estimates of clinical Se and Sp of metagenomics and C/S without assuming a gold standard in a large pen research setting. These findings demonstrate the potential of long-read metagenomics to support bovine respiratory disease diagnostics, AMR surveillance, and antimicrobial stewardship in feedlot cattle.

AntibioticsVol. 14(11)
University of Alberta (CA), Public Health Agency of Canada (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Microbial infections and disease research
1.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.