Fractal Characterization and Quantitative Petrophysical Prediction of Low-Permeability Glutenite Reservoirs in the Qaidam Basin, NW China

Low-permeability glutenite reservoirs in the Qaidam Basin, NW China, exhibit intricate pore networks and strong heterogeneity that hinder effective hydrocarbon development. Here, we integrate thin-section petrography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to characterize pore types and establish quantitative links between fractal dimension and petrophysical properties. The reservoirs are mainly pebbly sandstones and sandy conglomerates with 15–23% quartz, 27–37% feldspar, and 2–20% carbonate/muddy matrix. Helium porosity ranges from 5.12% to 18.11% (mean 9.39%) and air permeability from 60 to 3270 mD (mean 880 mD). Fine pores (1–10 μm) dominate, throats are short and poorly connected, and illite (up to 16.76%) lines pore walls, further reducing permeability. Fractal analysis yields weighted-average dimensions of 2.55, 2.50, and 2.15 for macro-, meso-, and micropores, respectively, giving an overall dimension of 2.52. Higher dimensions correlate negatively with porosity and permeability. Empirical models (quadratic for porosity and exponential for permeability) predict core data within 0.86% and 5.4% error, validated by six blind wells. Reservoirs are classified as Class I (>12%, >1.0 mD), Class II (8–12%, 0.5–1.0 mD), and Class III (<8%, <0.5 mD), providing a robust tool for stimulation design and numerical simulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6110311
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fractal Characterization and Quantitative Petrophysical Prediction of Low-Permeability Glutenite Reservoirs in the Qaidam Basin, NW China

Cheng Yang, Kun Shu, Zhengbin Wu, Yuhang Ren et al.
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Fractal Characterization and Quantitative Petrophysical Prediction of Low-Permeability Glutenite Reservoirs in the Qaidam Basin, NW China

Cheng Yang, Kun Shu, Zhengbin Wu, Yuhang Ren, Shu Jiang
article en

Abstract

Low-permeability glutenite reservoirs in the Qaidam Basin, NW China, exhibit intricate pore networks and strong heterogeneity that hinder effective hydrocarbon development. Here, we integrate thin-section petrography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to characterize pore types and establish quantitative links between fractal dimension and petrophysical properties. The reservoirs are mainly pebbly sandstones and sandy conglomerates with 15–23% quartz, 27–37% feldspar, and 2–20% carbonate/muddy matrix. Helium porosity ranges from 5.12% to 18.11% (mean 9.39%) and air permeability from 60 to 3270 mD (mean 880 mD). Fine pores (1–10 μm) dominate, throats are short and poorly connected, and illite (up to 16.76%) lines pore walls, further reducing permeability. Fractal analysis yields weighted-average dimensions of 2.55, 2.50, and 2.15 for macro-, meso-, and micropores, respectively, giving an overall dimension of 2.52. Higher dimensions correlate negatively with porosity and permeability. Empirical models (quadratic for porosity and exponential for permeability) predict core data within 0.86% and 5.4% error, validated by six blind wells. Reservoirs are classified as Class I (>12%, >1.0 mD), Class II (8–12%, 0.5–1.0 mD), and Class III (<8%, <0.5 mD), providing a robust tool for stimulation design and numerical simulation.

Eng—Advances in EngineeringVol. 6(11)
China University of Geosciences (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.