Praising the client in career guidance

Abstract In this article, we explore how praises directed at clients are used in Finnish career guidance encounters. More specifically, we examine how praise works as a tool for attending to the institutional agenda of career guidance. Our data set is a compilation of career and study guidance encounters within schools and universities, including 16 video-recorded and one audio-recorded career guidance sessions with 15 student-clients and 9 professionals. We use conversation analysis as an approach and method. Our analysis shows that the praises either focus on the client’s strengths or their effort and skill in “doing career work”. The praises occur in three contexts of performing institutional tasks of the encounters: 1. Mapping the client’s situation, where praise is used in closing-relevant positions to “set aside” unproblematic issues; 2. Taking a stance on the client’s strengths, where praise is offered to deliver professional views on the client’s character, and to counter their self-deprecations; and, 3. Contributing to decision-making, where praise is used to topicalize the client’s assets as cues to decision-making and to validate their interests. In general, the counsellors make efforts to show that their praise is grounded in the client’s self-report.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Text and Talk
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2024-0206
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Praising the client in career guidance

Sanna Vehviläinen, Liisa Voutilainen
1 citations
Text and Talk
Career Development and Diversity
2.37
article

Praising the client in career guidance

Sanna Vehviläinen, Liisa Voutilainen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we explore how praises directed at clients are used in Finnish career guidance encounters. More specifically, we examine how praise works as a tool for attending to the institutional agenda of career guidance. Our data set is a compilation of career and study guidance encounters within schools and universities, including 16 video-recorded and one audio-recorded career guidance sessions with 15 student-clients and 9 professionals. We use conversation analysis as an approach and method. Our analysis shows that the praises either focus on the client’s strengths or their effort and skill in “doing career work”. The praises occur in three contexts of performing institutional tasks of the encounters: 1. Mapping the client’s situation, where praise is used in closing-relevant positions to “set aside” unproblematic issues; 2. Taking a stance on the client’s strengths, where praise is offered to deliver professional views on the client’s character, and to counter their self-deprecations; and, 3. Contributing to decision-making, where praise is used to topicalize the client’s assets as cues to decision-making and to validate their interests. In general, the counsellors make efforts to show that their praise is grounded in the client’s self-report.

Text and Talk
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finland University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Career Development and Diversity
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.