A Comparison of Real-World Utility and Video Quality in Commercially Available Single-Use Ureteroscopes
This study is the largest head-to-head comparison to date, providing real-world data for urologists who are prospective purchasers and users of SU ureteroscopes. In the hands-on evaluation, users preferred Cook Ascend, Boston Scientific LithoVue Elite, and Storz Flex-XC1. The Flex-XC1 was rated higher in most categories in video quality evaluation.
Authors
- Robert V. Rege (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6864-713X)
- Stephen Hassig
- Scott Quarrier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2546-5264)
- Rajat Jain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0453-5574)
- Nitin Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3258-6467)
- Shreya Patel
Institutions
- University of Rochester Medical Center (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Endourology
- Published
- 2025-10-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251390908
- Primary Topic
- Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00