Co-developing resources for better public understanding of Longitudinal Population Study Data and the Law

IntroductionThe legal basis for using participants' data in Longitudinal Population Studies (LPS) is complex. Laws of particular relevance are (1) UK data protection legislation, including Data Protection Act 2018 and UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK-GDPR); (2) common law duty of confidentiality; (3) Digital Economy Act (DEA) 2017; (4) Section 251 of the National Health Service Act 2006; and (5) Health Service (Control of Patient Information) Regulations 2002. ObjectiveTo develop transparency materials for LPS participants to raise awareness and understanding of key laws, legal principles and their rights. MethodsPublic contributors from UK Longitudinal Linkage Collaboration (UK LLC), Health Data Research UK (HDR UK) and DATAMIND provided input to benchmark current public understanding of laws and legal principles relevant to research. Based on this involvement, we worked with the UK LLC Public Advisory Group (PAG) and external organisations to produce a series of infographics. These were available in written English, audio, British Sign Language (BSL) and additional languages, to reach as wide an audience as possible. ResultsInput from 56 public contributors informed the work by suggesting low levels of awareness of the laws and legal principles. The DEA was the least well-known, with 11% of people aware of this legislation and the most well-known was UK-GDPR, with 88% awareness. We developed key messages for LPS participants on what they should be aware of as individuals, including what they should expect from their LPS. The information is available to the public and LPS participants as a series of infographics (https://ukllc.ac.uk/lps-data-and-the-law). ConclusionOur series of transparency materials support LPS participants to understand the legal basis for study data use, and their rights. General awareness of the laws and legal principles involved in the use of longitudinal data is low and we recommend data providers should raise awareness in clear and accessible ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i2.2966
Primary Topic
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-developing resources for better public understanding of Longitudinal Population Study Data and the Law

Kirsteen Campbell, Sarah Chave, Rebecca Whitehorn, Robin Flaig et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
article

Co-developing resources for better public understanding of Longitudinal Population Study Data and the Law

Kirsteen Campbell, Sarah Chave, Rebecca Whitehorn, Robin Flaig, Michael D. Gregg, Jacqui Oakley, Katharine Evans, Emma L. Turner, Alex Bailey, Andy Boyd, Cassie Smith, Lidis Garbovan, Stela McLachlan, Rosie Hill, M. Docherty
article en

Abstract

IntroductionThe legal basis for using participants' data in Longitudinal Population Studies (LPS) is complex. Laws of particular relevance are (1) UK data protection legislation, including Data Protection Act 2018 and UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK-GDPR); (2) common law duty of confidentiality; (3) Digital Economy Act (DEA) 2017; (4) Section 251 of the National Health Service Act 2006; and (5) Health Service (Control of Patient Information) Regulations 2002. ObjectiveTo develop transparency materials for LPS participants to raise awareness and understanding of key laws, legal principles and their rights. MethodsPublic contributors from UK Longitudinal Linkage Collaboration (UK LLC), Health Data Research UK (HDR UK) and DATAMIND provided input to benchmark current public understanding of laws and legal principles relevant to research. Based on this involvement, we worked with the UK LLC Public Advisory Group (PAG) and external organisations to produce a series of infographics. These were available in written English, audio, British Sign Language (BSL) and additional languages, to reach as wide an audience as possible. ResultsInput from 56 public contributors informed the work by suggesting low levels of awareness of the laws and legal principles. The DEA was the least well-known, with 11% of people aware of this legislation and the most well-known was UK-GDPR, with 88% awareness. We developed key messages for LPS participants on what they should be aware of as individuals, including what they should expect from their LPS. The information is available to the public and LPS participants as a series of infographics (https://ukllc.ac.uk/lps-data-and-the-law). ConclusionOur series of transparency materials support LPS participants to understand the legal basis for study data use, and their rights. General awareness of the laws and legal principles involved in the use of longitudinal data is low and we recommend data providers should raise awareness in clear and accessible ways.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 10(2)
General Medical Council (GB), At Bristol (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Health Data Research UK (GB), Medical Research Council (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.