Cost calculation model of introducing Upadacitinib and Risankizumab for adult ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), affects approximately 4.9 million individuals globally. Advanced therapies have significantly improved IBD management; however, maintenance doses commonly exceed labeled recommendations for optimal efficacy. This study aimed to estimate the financial impact of introducing Risankizumab (RISA) for CD and Upadacitinib (UPA) for UC treatment in Saudi Arabia (KSA), incorporating adjusted dosing practices rather than label doses alone. Methods: Cost-calculation model (CCM) was developed to estimate average monthly costs per patient, capturing complexities like induction, maintenance adjustments, discontinuation, switching, re-induction, and death. Data on adjusted dosing were collected via two expert interviews. The CCM compared scenarios “with” and “without” UPA for UC, and “with” and “without” RISA for CD, analyzing financial impacts over a 5-year horizon, from the payer’s perspective. Results: Adjusted UC treatment doses increased five-year costs by 22% compared to label doses. Introducing UPA with adjusted dosing resulted in a 6.7% higher cost versus scenarios without UPA, based on tender prices. For CD, adjusted dosing increased treatment costs by 24.5% compared to label doses. However, adding RISA with adjusted dosing slightly reduced the total drug cost by 0.35%. Conclusion: Expert interviews and detailed patient pathway modeling indicated substantial cost increases for UC and CD treatments in KSA when adjusted doses were considered. The introduction of UPA and RISA under adjusted dosing yielded minor financial differences, with potential implications for economic evaluations in other regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_245_25
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost calculation model of introducing Upadacitinib and Risankizumab for adult ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Mahmoud Mosli, Ahmad Nader Fasseeh, Ali Mostafa Anwar, Bushra Alharbi et al.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Cost calculation model of introducing Upadacitinib and Risankizumab for adult ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Mahmoud Mosli, Ahmad Nader Fasseeh, Ali Mostafa Anwar, Bushra Alharbi, H Alabdulkarim, Abdullah M. Alshahrani, Kareem Ahmed El-Fass, Rayd Almehizia, Esraa Altawil, Abdulelah Almutairdi, Layla N. Alanizy, Hussain A. Alqasim, Wael K. Iskandarani, Haneen J. Alshareef, Ibtisam H. Alharbi, Rok Hren, Abdulrahman M. Alkhurmi
article en

Abstract

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), affects approximately 4.9 million individuals globally. Advanced therapies have significantly improved IBD management; however, maintenance doses commonly exceed labeled recommendations for optimal efficacy. This study aimed to estimate the financial impact of introducing Risankizumab (RISA) for CD and Upadacitinib (UPA) for UC treatment in Saudi Arabia (KSA), incorporating adjusted dosing practices rather than label doses alone. Methods: Cost-calculation model (CCM) was developed to estimate average monthly costs per patient, capturing complexities like induction, maintenance adjustments, discontinuation, switching, re-induction, and death. Data on adjusted dosing were collected via two expert interviews. The CCM compared scenarios “with” and “without” UPA for UC, and “with” and “without” RISA for CD, analyzing financial impacts over a 5-year horizon, from the payer’s perspective. Results: Adjusted UC treatment doses increased five-year costs by 22% compared to label doses. Introducing UPA with adjusted dosing resulted in a 6.7% higher cost versus scenarios without UPA, based on tender prices. For CD, adjusted dosing increased treatment costs by 24.5% compared to label doses. However, adding RISA with adjusted dosing slightly reduced the total drug cost by 0.35%. Conclusion: Expert interviews and detailed patient pathway modeling indicated substantial cost increases for UC and CD treatments in KSA when adjusted doses were considered. The introduction of UPA and RISA under adjusted dosing yielded minor financial differences, with potential implications for economic evaluations in other regions.

Saudi Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 32(1)
Obuda University (HU), Middle East Institute (US), Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Alfaisal University (SA), Prince Sultan University (SA), King Abdulaziz University (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), King Saud Medical City (SA), King Fahd Medical City (SA), King Fahad Specialist Hospital (SA), King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Institute of Mathematics, Physics, and Mechanics (SI), Agrárközgazdasági Intézet (HU), Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Hungarian Institute of Occupational Health (HU), King Abdullah Medical City (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA), Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.