Optimization of energy consumption in the gas refinery sweetening unit using RSM, ANN, and Aspen HYSYS

This research focuses on introducing the gas sweetening unit and identifying its optimal operating conditions using advanced modeling techniques. By analyzing experimental data collected over 1227 days from a gas refinery's sweetening unit, the study investigates factors influencing energy consumption. Two methods, response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), were employed to model the process, with the ANNs utilizing a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a radial basis function (RBF). The R² value for RSM was 0.930, whereas the ANN models achieved higher accuracy, with R² values of 0.981 for RBF and 0.986 for MLP. Performance metrics also favored MLP, which recorded a lower error value of 0.002 compared to RBF (0.0051), making MLP the preferred method. Using the optimized MLP model, it was predicted that with an input feed of 8.3 MMSCM, 30.3% DEA amine, and 12.7% methyl diethanol amine (MDEA), fuel consumption could be reduced to 17380.2 SCM - a saving of 12710 SCM. Finally, the accuracy of the MLP model's predictions was validated through simulations in Aspen HYSYS, further confirming its effectiveness in optimizing energy consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22629-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of energy consumption in the gas refinery sweetening unit using RSM, ANN, and Aspen HYSYS

Bahman Heydari, Ahad Ghaemi, Abolfazl Shokri, Erfan Gholamzadeh
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Process Optimization and Integration
2.43
article

Optimization of energy consumption in the gas refinery sweetening unit using RSM, ANN, and Aspen HYSYS

Bahman Heydari, Ahad Ghaemi, Abolfazl Shokri, Erfan Gholamzadeh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research focuses on introducing the gas sweetening unit and identifying its optimal operating conditions using advanced modeling techniques. By analyzing experimental data collected over 1227 days from a gas refinery's sweetening unit, the study investigates factors influencing energy consumption. Two methods, response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), were employed to model the process, with the ANNs utilizing a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a radial basis function (RBF). The R² value for RSM was 0.930, whereas the ANN models achieved higher accuracy, with R² values of 0.981 for RBF and 0.986 for MLP. Performance metrics also favored MLP, which recorded a lower error value of 0.002 compared to RBF (0.0051), making MLP the preferred method. Using the optimized MLP model, it was predicted that with an input feed of 8.3 MMSCM, 30.3% DEA amine, and 12.7% methyl diethanol amine (MDEA), fuel consumption could be reduced to 17380.2 SCM - a saving of 12710 SCM. Finally, the accuracy of the MLP model's predictions was validated through simulations in Aspen HYSYS, further confirming its effectiveness in optimizing energy consumption.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Petroleum University of Technology (IR), University of Tehran (IR), Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Process Optimization and Integration
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimization of energy consumption in the gas refinery sweetening unit using RSM, ANN, and Aspen HYSYS — Bahman Heydari, Ahad Ghaemi, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS