Space Charge Layer Evolution in All-Solid-State Batteries Probed via Operando Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy and Nuclear Reaction Analysis

The current controversies about the role of space charge layers hinder the development of better solid-solid interfaces and, thus, the improvement of solid-state batteries (ASSBs). To overcome this, we have combined high spatial resolution and nondestructive techniques, operando heterodyne Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), and operando nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) to conduct a study of space charge layers in ASSBs. A model thin-film ASSB was fabricated from lithium (Li)|Li<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (LPO)|LiCoO<sub>2</sub> (LCO) for this study. This battery excels due to negligible interfacial defects and side reactions. For a working battery voltage range from 3.0 to 4.3 V vs Li/Li<sup>+</sup>, a space charge layer mainly exists at the LPO|LCO interface. This space charge layer with a width <50 nm arises from the redistribution of Li-ions at the interface. We clarified controversial views on the role of space charge layers in ASSBs by quantitatively determining the interfacial space charge layer resistance and found a maximum value between 18.4 and 19.1 Ω cm<sup>2</sup> at 4.3 V vs Li/Li<sup>+</sup>. The absolute value of interfacial resistance from space charge layer formation is much smaller compared with the bulk solid electrolyte resistance in the fabricated thin-film ASSB. By employing KPFM and NRA techniques in ASSB research, our knowledge of space charge layer evolution at the solid electrolyte electrode interface is more comprehensive, even beyond the investigation of space charge layers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Nano
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5c10125
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Space Charge Layer Evolution in All-Solid-State Batteries Probed via Operando Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy and Nuclear Reaction Analysis

Ryota Shimizu, Hiroshi Kumigashira, Rüdiger Berger, Franjo Weber et al.
2 citations
ACS Nano
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
1.46
article

Space Charge Layer Evolution in All-Solid-State Batteries Probed via Operando Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy and Nuclear Reaction Analysis

Ryota Shimizu, Hiroshi Kumigashira, Rüdiger Berger, Franjo Weber, Daiichiro Sekiba, Kazunori Nishio, Koji Horiba, Shigeru Kobayashi, Kun‐Han Lin, Taro Hitosugi, Chao Zhu, Miho Kitamura, Yuki Sugisawa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The current controversies about the role of space charge layers hinder the development of better solid-solid interfaces and, thus, the improvement of solid-state batteries (ASSBs). To overcome this, we have combined high spatial resolution and nondestructive techniques, operando heterodyne Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), and operando nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) to conduct a study of space charge layers in ASSBs. A model thin-film ASSB was fabricated from lithium (Li)|Li<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (LPO)|LiCoO<sub>2</sub> (LCO) for this study. This battery excels due to negligible interfacial defects and side reactions. For a working battery voltage range from 3.0 to 4.3 V vs Li/Li<sup>+</sup>, a space charge layer mainly exists at the LPO|LCO interface. This space charge layer with a width <50 nm arises from the redistribution of Li-ions at the interface. We clarified controversial views on the role of space charge layers in ASSBs by quantitatively determining the interfacial space charge layer resistance and found a maximum value between 18.4 and 19.1 Ω cm<sup>2</sup> at 4.3 V vs Li/Li<sup>+</sup>. The absolute value of interfacial resistance from space charge layer formation is much smaller compared with the bulk solid electrolyte resistance in the fabricated thin-film ASSB. By employing KPFM and NRA techniques in ASSB research, our knowledge of space charge layer evolution at the solid electrolyte electrode interface is more comprehensive, even beyond the investigation of space charge layers.

ACS NanoVol. 19(45)
Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP), University of Tsukuba (JP), Tohoku University (JP), National Tsing Hua University (TW), Advanced Institute of Materials Science (JP), Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (DE), National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (JP), Institute for Multidisciplinary Research, The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.