Olaparib, durvalumab, and cyclophosphamide, and a prognostic blood signature in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: the randomized phase 2 SOLACE2 trial

SOLACE2 (ACTRN12618000686202) investigates whether 12-weeks of olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib priming, improves subsequent durvalumab-olaparib progression-free survival (PFS), and is superior to olaparib monotherapy without any priming, in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (n = 114). We also evaluate the utility of CUP-CC assay, an immune signature of C-C chemokine receptor type 4 up-regulation, chemokines, and cytokines. Priming with olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib, followed by durvalumab-olaparib, are both associated with longer PFS compared to olaparib monotherapy, but do not reach the pre-specified primary endpoint of 36-week trial threshold (PFS36). PFS36 rates are 47.4% (95% CI, 31.0-62.1; olaparib priming then olaparib-durvalumab), 48.7% (32.5-63.2; olaparib-cyclophosphamide then olaparib-durvalumab) and 35.1% (20.4-50.3; olaparib monotherapy). PFS is significantly longer for the homologous recombination deficient (N = 71) as compared to the proficient (HRP) (N = 29) subgroups (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.55, 0.35-0.87). CUP-CC+ subgroup (N = 58) has a significantly longer PFS (HR 0.31, 0.19-0.49) than CUP-CC- (N = 46). Future studies should investigate whether CUP-CC has the potential to personalize poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapies for patients who are BRCA wild-type, including HRP patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64130-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Olaparib, durvalumab, and cyclophosphamide, and a prognostic blood signature in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: the randomized phase 2 SOLACE2 trial

Matthew J. Wakefield, Sally E. Baron-Hay, Cassandra J. Vandenberg, Emily Cassar et al.
2 citations
Nature Communications
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
2.09
article

Olaparib, durvalumab, and cyclophosphamide, and a prognostic blood signature in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: the randomized phase 2 SOLACE2 trial

Matthew J. Wakefield, Sally E. Baron-Hay, Cassandra J. Vandenberg, Emily Cassar, Janine Lombard, Hina Amer, Katherine E. Francis, Michael Leonard Friedlander, Cyril Deceneux, Claire M. Davies, Rachel O’Connell, Catherine Shannon, Yoland Antill, Michael Quinn, Sandy Simon, Kristy Shield‐Artin, Ksenija Nesic, Mutsa Madondo, Momodou Cox, Anthony T. Papenfuss, U. G. I. U. Kariyawasam, Philip Beale, Justin Bedő, Nirashaa Bound, Magdalena Plebanski, Chee Khoon Lee, Apriliana E. R. Kartikasari, Yeh Chen Lee, Danka Sinikovic Zebic, Katrina Diamante, Clare L. Scott, Georgia Goodchild, Andrew Jarratt, Sudarshan Selva‐Nayagam, Anneliese Linaker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

SOLACE2 (ACTRN12618000686202) investigates whether 12-weeks of olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib priming, improves subsequent durvalumab-olaparib progression-free survival (PFS), and is superior to olaparib monotherapy without any priming, in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (n = 114). We also evaluate the utility of CUP-CC assay, an immune signature of C-C chemokine receptor type 4 up-regulation, chemokines, and cytokines. Priming with olaparib, or cyclophosphamide-olaparib, followed by durvalumab-olaparib, are both associated with longer PFS compared to olaparib monotherapy, but do not reach the pre-specified primary endpoint of 36-week trial threshold (PFS36). PFS36 rates are 47.4% (95% CI, 31.0-62.1; olaparib priming then olaparib-durvalumab), 48.7% (32.5-63.2; olaparib-cyclophosphamide then olaparib-durvalumab) and 35.1% (20.4-50.3; olaparib monotherapy). PFS is significantly longer for the homologous recombination deficient (N = 71) as compared to the proficient (HRP) (N = 29) subgroups (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.55, 0.35-0.87). CUP-CC+ subgroup (N = 58) has a significantly longer PFS (HR 0.31, 0.19-0.49) than CUP-CC- (N = 46). Future studies should investigate whether CUP-CC has the potential to personalize poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapies for patients who are BRCA wild-type, including HRP patients.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), Mater Health Services (AU), Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), Royal Women's Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU), Royal Hospital for Women (AU), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Monash Medical Centre (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (AU), Peninsula Health (AU), St George Hospital (AU), Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (AU), National Health and Medical Research Council (AU), Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Genomic Health, Clovis Oncology, Australian Government, BeiGene, Australian Cancer Research Foundation, University of Sydney, RMIT University, Eisai, Sierra Oncology, Genentech, National Health and Medical Research Council, Cancer Council Victoria, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.