Building a multi-model fusion prostate cancer risk prediction model based on clinical data and machine learning

To provide a reference for the initial diagnosis of clinical prostate cancer, we identified predictors and established a risk prediction model by analyzing a national Chinese prostate tumor dataset. Average value was used to interpolate the data from a prostate cancer dataset provided by the National Population Health Data Center of China. Factor screening was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and binary logistic regression. A multicollinearity analysis was performed on the variables. Cleaned data were divided into training and test datasets. Seven machine learning models and the 3 traditional clinical models were constructed. The top 3 models in terms of predictive efficacy were fused using a voting method. Accuracy, precision, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve metrics were used to evaluate the model. Feature importance analysis was used to determine the importance of the variables in each model. The study included 2213 cases: 1107 in the training set and 1106 in the test set. The prostate cancer model was established using back propagation neural network, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting algorithms and achieved an accuracy of 0.74, sensitivity of 0.78, F1 score of 0.77, and area under the curve of 0.80. The 5 key predictors of prostate cancer were the percentage of free prostate cancer-specific antigen, and the levels of inorganic phosphorus, apolipoprotein A1, free prostate cancer-specific antigen, and total prostate cancer-specific antigen. There was no high correlation among the variables. Our model based on fusing multiple models was good at assessing the risk of prostate cancer. This model could assist urologists in making appropriate treatment choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045319
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a multi-model fusion prostate cancer risk prediction model based on clinical data and machine learning

Qianqian Gao, Qi Jing, Wenjia Feng, Zhanhao Shi et al.
Medicine
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Building a multi-model fusion prostate cancer risk prediction model based on clinical data and machine learning

Qianqian Gao, Qi Jing, Wenjia Feng, Zhanhao Shi, Hongqing An, Weiqin Cai, Pengxin Geng, Runguo Gao
article en

Abstract

To provide a reference for the initial diagnosis of clinical prostate cancer, we identified predictors and established a risk prediction model by analyzing a national Chinese prostate tumor dataset. Average value was used to interpolate the data from a prostate cancer dataset provided by the National Population Health Data Center of China. Factor screening was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and binary logistic regression. A multicollinearity analysis was performed on the variables. Cleaned data were divided into training and test datasets. Seven machine learning models and the 3 traditional clinical models were constructed. The top 3 models in terms of predictive efficacy were fused using a voting method. Accuracy, precision, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve metrics were used to evaluate the model. Feature importance analysis was used to determine the importance of the variables in each model. The study included 2213 cases: 1107 in the training set and 1106 in the test set. The prostate cancer model was established using back propagation neural network, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting algorithms and achieved an accuracy of 0.74, sensitivity of 0.78, F1 score of 0.77, and area under the curve of 0.80. The 5 key predictors of prostate cancer were the percentage of free prostate cancer-specific antigen, and the levels of inorganic phosphorus, apolipoprotein A1, free prostate cancer-specific antigen, and total prostate cancer-specific antigen. There was no high correlation among the variables. Our model based on fusing multiple models was good at assessing the risk of prostate cancer. This model could assist urologists in making appropriate treatment choices.

MedicineVol. 104(42)
Weifang Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.