Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural steroid injection versus tramadol-based therapy in borderline surgical lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective cohort study

Patients with borderline surgical lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), defined by significant canal narrowing without absolute surgical indications, present a therapeutic challenge. While caudal epidural steroid injections (ESI) are widely used, direct comparisons with pharmacological therapy remain limited. This study compared ultrasound-guided caudal ESI and tramadol-based therapy on pain, disability, walking capacity, and analgesic use. This single-center retrospective cohort included adults with LSS and dural cross-sectional area 50 to 75 mm². Two contemporaneous cohorts were analyzed: one treated with ultrasound-guided caudal ESI (dexamethasone 12 mg + 0.25% bupivacaine, 8 mL), the other with standardized tramadol/paracetamol (37.5/325 mg TID). Outcomes were Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and daily nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use at baseline and 6 months. Analyses used nonparametric tests and analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline clinical and radiological variables. Fifty-five patients received ESI and 60 tramadol-based therapy. Both cohorts improved significantly (all P < .001). In the ESI group, VAS decreased from 8.85 ± 1.03 to 4.09 ± 0.89 (1M), 3.71 ± 0.83 (3M), and 5.76 ± 0.77 (6M). ODI improved from 56.18 ± 3.04% to 23.80 ± 3.08%, 27.80 ± 2.86%, and 37.78 ± 2.88%. 6MWT rose by ~83 m and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use decreased (P < .001). In controls, VAS declined to 5.52 ± 1.30, 5.78 ± 1.22, and 5.92 ± 1.28 at 1, 3, and 6M; ODI to 38.54 ± 11.18%, 40.14 ± 10.44%, and 42.70 ± 7.74%; 6MWT rose by ~50 m (all P < .001). Between-group comparisons showed greater improvement with ESI at 1 to 3M for VAS (P < .001) and at all time points for ODI (P < .001), but no difference in VAS at 6M (P = .568). Analysis of covariance confirmed these results. Higher baseline symptom burden predicted greater 6M improvement. In borderline surgical LSS, ultrasound-guided caudal ESI provides faster and greater pain and functional improvement than tramadol-based therapy. Pain benefit attenuates by 6 months, but functional gains persist. ESI may serve as an effective interim option to enhance mobility and quality of life in carefully selected patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045305
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural steroid injection versus tramadol-based therapy in borderline surgical lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective cohort study

Cemil Aktan, Çile Aktan
Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural steroid injection versus tramadol-based therapy in borderline surgical lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective cohort study

Cemil Aktan, Çile Aktan
article en

Abstract

Patients with borderline surgical lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), defined by significant canal narrowing without absolute surgical indications, present a therapeutic challenge. While caudal epidural steroid injections (ESI) are widely used, direct comparisons with pharmacological therapy remain limited. This study compared ultrasound-guided caudal ESI and tramadol-based therapy on pain, disability, walking capacity, and analgesic use. This single-center retrospective cohort included adults with LSS and dural cross-sectional area 50 to 75 mm². Two contemporaneous cohorts were analyzed: one treated with ultrasound-guided caudal ESI (dexamethasone 12 mg + 0.25% bupivacaine, 8 mL), the other with standardized tramadol/paracetamol (37.5/325 mg TID). Outcomes were Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and daily nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use at baseline and 6 months. Analyses used nonparametric tests and analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline clinical and radiological variables. Fifty-five patients received ESI and 60 tramadol-based therapy. Both cohorts improved significantly (all P < .001). In the ESI group, VAS decreased from 8.85 ± 1.03 to 4.09 ± 0.89 (1M), 3.71 ± 0.83 (3M), and 5.76 ± 0.77 (6M). ODI improved from 56.18 ± 3.04% to 23.80 ± 3.08%, 27.80 ± 2.86%, and 37.78 ± 2.88%. 6MWT rose by ~83 m and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use decreased (P < .001). In controls, VAS declined to 5.52 ± 1.30, 5.78 ± 1.22, and 5.92 ± 1.28 at 1, 3, and 6M; ODI to 38.54 ± 11.18%, 40.14 ± 10.44%, and 42.70 ± 7.74%; 6MWT rose by ~50 m (all P < .001). Between-group comparisons showed greater improvement with ESI at 1 to 3M for VAS (P < .001) and at all time points for ODI (P < .001), but no difference in VAS at 6M (P = .568). Analysis of covariance confirmed these results. Higher baseline symptom burden predicted greater 6M improvement. In borderline surgical LSS, ultrasound-guided caudal ESI provides faster and greater pain and functional improvement than tramadol-based therapy. Pain benefit attenuates by 6 months, but functional gains persist. ESI may serve as an effective interim option to enhance mobility and quality of life in carefully selected patients.

MedicineVol. 104(42)
Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.