The impact of knowledge management on employee job satisfaction: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis examined the relationship between knowledge management (KM) and job satisfaction (JS) across various industries. Inadequate KM practices and dissatisfaction at work are associated with poor work quality, low productivity, operational inefficiencies and financial repercussions. The study utilised Google Scholar, ProQuest and PubMed to identify 21 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2020 and 2025, and a meta-analysis of them was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The combined effect size was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.54-0.58), suggesting a moderately positive relationship between KM and JS. Healthcare and accounting, IT and banking had consistent positive effects (r = 0.56). Academia (r = 0.52), governmental organisations had a slightly weaker effect (r = 0.37), and manufacturing and construction had a near-zero effect (r = 0.06). This research addresses the gap in providing customised KM solutions that are responsive to industry-specific contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkms.2025.149505
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of knowledge management on employee job satisfaction: a meta-analysis

Abraham Dongo, Eric E. Mang', N.A. unyi, Caspah Kamunda
International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

The impact of knowledge management on employee job satisfaction: a meta-analysis

Abraham Dongo, Eric E. Mang', N.A. unyi, Caspah Kamunda
article en

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined the relationship between knowledge management (KM) and job satisfaction (JS) across various industries. Inadequate KM practices and dissatisfaction at work are associated with poor work quality, low productivity, operational inefficiencies and financial repercussions. The study utilised Google Scholar, ProQuest and PubMed to identify 21 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2020 and 2025, and a meta-analysis of them was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The combined effect size was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.54-0.58), suggesting a moderately positive relationship between KM and JS. Healthcare and accounting, IT and banking had consistent positive effects (r = 0.56). Academia (r = 0.52), governmental organisations had a slightly weaker effect (r = 0.37), and manufacturing and construction had a near-zero effect (r = 0.06). This research addresses the gap in providing customised KM solutions that are responsive to industry-specific contexts.

International Journal of Knowledge Management StudiesVol. 16(3)
University of Malawi (MW), University of Namibia (NA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.