Exploring Reticence to Write in L2

Developing writing proficiency is essential to communicative competence in foreign language learning, yet Uruguayan public secondary students frequently display reluctance toward writing in English, as noted by their teachers. This study investigates EFL teachers’ perceptions regarding student engagement in writing, aiming to determine the prevalence and underlying causes of the identified reticence, as well as the instructional practices teachers employ to address it. Utilizing a descriptive, survey-based approach, the study collected 58 responses—about 5% of Uruguay’s public EFL teaching population—via an electronic questionnaire. The instrument comprised both multiple-choice and open-ended questions to enable quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results reveal that 52.8% of teachers view students as generally reticent to write in English, while 47.2% observe partial reluctance. Contributing factors include students’ low confidence, restricted vocabulary, inadequate early exposure to writing, and lack of engagement with tasks perceived as irrelevant to their interests. While 94% of teachers dedicate class time to writing, many highlight time constraints and curricular requirements as significant barriers to adopting a more systematic approach. The process approach to writing (47%) is the most widely implemented methodology, followed by the product approach (11.7%), with just 5.8% using a genre-based approach. Notably, 11.7% of teachers report unfamiliarity with any writing pedagogy. The findings underscore the need for greater emphasis on process- and genre-based writing instruction in EFL classrooms. Future research should examine the effectiveness of specific pedagogical interventions, explore student perspectives on writing reluctance, and consider the role of teacher training in improving writing outcomes in EFL contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cuadernos de Investigación Educativa
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18861/cied.2025.16.especial.4119
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Reticence to Write in L2

Gabriel Díaz Maggioli
Cuadernos de Investigación Educativa
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Exploring Reticence to Write in L2

Gabriel Díaz Maggioli
article en

Abstract

Developing writing proficiency is essential to communicative competence in foreign language learning, yet Uruguayan public secondary students frequently display reluctance toward writing in English, as noted by their teachers. This study investigates EFL teachers’ perceptions regarding student engagement in writing, aiming to determine the prevalence and underlying causes of the identified reticence, as well as the instructional practices teachers employ to address it. Utilizing a descriptive, survey-based approach, the study collected 58 responses—about 5% of Uruguay’s public EFL teaching population—via an electronic questionnaire. The instrument comprised both multiple-choice and open-ended questions to enable quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results reveal that 52.8% of teachers view students as generally reticent to write in English, while 47.2% observe partial reluctance. Contributing factors include students’ low confidence, restricted vocabulary, inadequate early exposure to writing, and lack of engagement with tasks perceived as irrelevant to their interests. While 94% of teachers dedicate class time to writing, many highlight time constraints and curricular requirements as significant barriers to adopting a more systematic approach. The process approach to writing (47%) is the most widely implemented methodology, followed by the product approach (11.7%), with just 5.8% using a genre-based approach. Notably, 11.7% of teachers report unfamiliarity with any writing pedagogy. The findings underscore the need for greater emphasis on process- and genre-based writing instruction in EFL classrooms. Future research should examine the effectiveness of specific pedagogical interventions, explore student perspectives on writing reluctance, and consider the role of teacher training in improving writing outcomes in EFL contexts.

Cuadernos de Investigación EducativaVol. 16(especial)
Universidad ORT Uruguay (UY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.