Test–retest Reliability of Biomechanical Measures and Clinical Pain Outcomes in Runners with Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (MTSS)

Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) is a common overuse injury in runners, leading to pain and reduced training capacity. Reliable assessment of biomechanical and clinical outcomes is essential to distinguish true clinical change from measurement error and for guiding rehabilitation and return-to-running decisions. However, evidence for the reliability of commonly used measures in MTSS is limited. # Purpose To determine the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of common biomechanical and clinical outcomes in runners with MTSS. # Study design Test-retest reliability study. # Methods Twenty-two runners with MTSS were assessed twice, three days apart, by the same examiner. Biomechanical outcomes included center of pressure (COP) trajectory during running and cross-sectional area (CSA) and strength of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle. Clinical outcomes included linear pain distance on palpation along the posteromedial tibial border, and pain level reported using a visual analog scale (VAS). Paired t-tests were used to analyze the differences between sessions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC<sub>3,k</sub>) were calculated to assess reliability. The standard error of measurement (SEM), the MDC and the Bland-Altman plot were calculated. # Results No significant differences between sessions were observed for any outcome. Test-retest reliability was good to excellent for COP (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>=0.92), linear pain distance on palpation along the posteromedial tibial border (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>=0.94), CSA (ICC<sub>3,3</sub>=0.82), and FHL strength (ICC<sub>3,3</sub>=0.88). SEM and MDC value were 0.86% and 2.38% for COP, 0.77 cm and 2.12 cm for linear pain distance on palpation along the posteromedial tibial border, 0.23 cm² and 0.63 cm² for CSA, and 0.54 kg and 1.49 kg for FHL strength. The Bland-Altman plot shows the agreement of all variables. # Conclusion Common biomechanical and clinical outcomes in runner with MTSS demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability. The established MDC values provide reference thresholds for interpreting meaningful change and support evidence-based rehabilitation and return-to-running protocols. # Level of evidence Level 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.146221
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test–retest Reliability of Biomechanical Measures and Clinical Pain Outcomes in Runners with Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (MTSS)

Ekalak Sitthipornvorakul, Torkamol Hunsawong, Ploypailin Namkorn, Uraiwan Chatchawan et al.
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Test–retest Reliability of Biomechanical Measures and Clinical Pain Outcomes in Runners with Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (MTSS)

Ekalak Sitthipornvorakul, Torkamol Hunsawong, Ploypailin Namkorn, Uraiwan Chatchawan, Wilawan Chaiut, Kurusart Konharn, Sawitri Wanpen
article en

Abstract

Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) is a common overuse injury in runners, leading to pain and reduced training capacity. Reliable assessment of biomechanical and clinical outcomes is essential to distinguish true clinical change from measurement error and for guiding rehabilitation and return-to-running decisions. However, evidence for the reliability of commonly used measures in MTSS is limited. # Purpose To determine the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of common biomechanical and clinical outcomes in runners with MTSS. # Study design Test-retest reliability study. # Methods Twenty-two runners with MTSS were assessed twice, three days apart, by the same examiner. Biomechanical outcomes included center of pressure (COP) trajectory during running and cross-sectional area (CSA) and strength of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle. Clinical outcomes included linear pain distance on palpation along the posteromedial tibial border, and pain level reported using a visual analog scale (VAS). Paired t-tests were used to analyze the differences between sessions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC<sub>3,k</sub>) were calculated to assess reliability. The standard error of measurement (SEM), the MDC and the Bland-Altman plot were calculated. # Results No significant differences between sessions were observed for any outcome. Test-retest reliability was good to excellent for COP (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>=0.92), linear pain distance on palpation along the posteromedial tibial border (ICC<sub>3,1</sub>=0.94), CSA (ICC<sub>3,3</sub>=0.82), and FHL strength (ICC<sub>3,3</sub>=0.88). SEM and MDC value were 0.86% and 2.38% for COP, 0.77 cm and 2.12 cm for linear pain distance on palpation along the posteromedial tibial border, 0.23 cm² and 0.63 cm² for CSA, and 0.54 kg and 1.49 kg for FHL strength. The Bland-Altman plot shows the agreement of all variables. # Conclusion Common biomechanical and clinical outcomes in runner with MTSS demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability. The established MDC values provide reference thresholds for interpreting meaningful change and support evidence-based rehabilitation and return-to-running protocols. # Level of evidence Level 3.

International Journal of Sports Physical TherapyVol. 20(11)
Khon Kaen University (TH), Mae Fah Luang University (TH), Mae Fah Luang University Hospital (TH)
Khon Kaen University, Thailand Science Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.