A comparison of methods to compute the rate of horizontal geomagnetic field variation

Abstract. The rate of change of the horizontal external magnetic field is often used as a proxy for space weather activity and in particular for estimating geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in high voltage power grids. This paper compares two commonly adopted methods for computing this rate of change: (1) the difference between consecutive measurements in the magnitude of the horizontal magnetic field, H′, and (2) the combined difference in the magnitude in the northward and eastward directions, usually denoted R. We find that there can be an absolute difference in the calculations between the two methodologies exceeding 100 nT min−1 during storm times for observatories in the sub-auroral zone, demonstrating that the choice between R and H′ can make a significant difference to any GIC estimate. We also note an observable difference between the two methodologies during quiet times when the measurements are made close to the agonic line, though this difference does not have a significant impact on the efficacy of either of the two methodologies for GIC studies. Future studies should consider carefully the choice of geomagnetic indicators for estimation of GICs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annales Geophysicae
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-687-2025
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of methods to compute the rate of horizontal geomagnetic field variation

Ciarán Beggan, G. S. Richardson, Kathy Whaler, Philip W. Livermore et al.
Annales Geophysicae
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

A comparison of methods to compute the rate of horizontal geomagnetic field variation

Ciarán Beggan, G. S. Richardson, Kathy Whaler, Philip W. Livermore, Sophie Fielding
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The rate of change of the horizontal external magnetic field is often used as a proxy for space weather activity and in particular for estimating geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in high voltage power grids. This paper compares two commonly adopted methods for computing this rate of change: (1) the difference between consecutive measurements in the magnitude of the horizontal magnetic field, H′, and (2) the combined difference in the magnitude in the northward and eastward directions, usually denoted R. We find that there can be an absolute difference in the calculations between the two methodologies exceeding 100 nT min−1 during storm times for observatories in the sub-auroral zone, demonstrating that the choice between R and H′ can make a significant difference to any GIC estimate. We also note an observable difference between the two methodologies during quiet times when the measurements are made close to the agonic line, though this difference does not have a significant impact on the efficacy of either of the two methodologies for GIC studies. Future studies should consider carefully the choice of geomagnetic indicators for estimation of GICs.

Annales GeophysicaeVol. 43(2)
University of Leeds (GB), British Geological Survey (GB), James Hutton Institute (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
University of Otago, Met Office, British Geological Survey, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison of methods to compute the rate of horizontal geomagnetic field variation — Ciarán Beggan, G. S. Richardson, et al. · Annales Geophysicae (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS