Materiality Thresholds in Maltese External Auditing: An Analysis

The objectives of this study are to (i) ascertain the major quantitative and qualitative factors influencing the determination of materiality thresholds in the private sector external audits performed by large and medium-sized Maltese audit firms, (ii) assess the effectiveness of ISA 320 in the determination of such materiality thresholds, as well as the impact of introducing more prescriptive guidelines within the Standard, and (iii) assess the current level of professional judgement and its effectiveness in determining materiality thresholds, as well as ascertain the typical challenges involved in exercising such judgement. A predominantly qualitative mixed-methods approach was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with twelve audit partners from large and medium-sized Maltese audit firms. The findings indicated that the major quantitative factors influencing overall materiality were 5–10% of profit before tax and 1–3% of total revenue. The major quantitative factor influencing performance materiality and the clearly trivial threshold was 75% and 5% of overall materiality, respectively. Additionally, the major qualitative factors influencing materiality thresholds were fraud and litigation risk, quality of client internal controls, auditor critical thinking skills, client complexity, the client’s sector and a change in auditor. Furthermore, the findings indicated that ISA 320 provided sufficient guidance for determining materiality thresholds. Moreover, the most cited benefit of introducing more prescriptive guidelines within the Standard was greater consistency among auditors, while the most cited drawback was the limitation on professional judgement. The findings also revealed that professional judgement was crucial and generally effective in determining materiality thresholds. However, auditors typically faced a few challenges when exercising such judgement, of which time pressure and the setting of appropriate thresholds are particularly significant.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas110303
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Materiality Thresholds in Maltese External Auditing: An Analysis

Simon Grima, Peter J. Baldacchino, Lauren Ellul, Norbert Tabone et al.
Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Materiality Thresholds in Maltese External Auditing: An Analysis

Simon Grima, Peter J. Baldacchino, Lauren Ellul, Norbert Tabone, Matthew Pisani
article en

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to (i) ascertain the major quantitative and qualitative factors influencing the determination of materiality thresholds in the private sector external audits performed by large and medium-sized Maltese audit firms, (ii) assess the effectiveness of ISA 320 in the determination of such materiality thresholds, as well as the impact of introducing more prescriptive guidelines within the Standard, and (iii) assess the current level of professional judgement and its effectiveness in determining materiality thresholds, as well as ascertain the typical challenges involved in exercising such judgement. A predominantly qualitative mixed-methods approach was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with twelve audit partners from large and medium-sized Maltese audit firms. The findings indicated that the major quantitative factors influencing overall materiality were 5–10% of profit before tax and 1–3% of total revenue. The major quantitative factor influencing performance materiality and the clearly trivial threshold was 75% and 5% of overall materiality, respectively. Additionally, the major qualitative factors influencing materiality thresholds were fraud and litigation risk, quality of client internal controls, auditor critical thinking skills, client complexity, the client’s sector and a change in auditor. Furthermore, the findings indicated that ISA 320 provided sufficient guidance for determining materiality thresholds. Moreover, the most cited benefit of introducing more prescriptive guidelines within the Standard was greater consistency among auditors, while the most cited drawback was the limitation on professional judgement. The findings also revealed that professional judgement was crucial and generally effective in determining materiality thresholds. However, auditors typically faced a few challenges when exercising such judgement, of which time pressure and the setting of appropriate thresholds are particularly significant.

Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing StudiesVol. 11(3)
Università ta' Malta
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.