The Dark Five - statistical anomaly or persistent phenomena: An exploratory investigation into the factor structure of the SD4 in multiple samples

Recent analysis of the dark tetrad has tentatively proposed that a more appropriate representation of dark traits, consisting of 22 items loading onto a 5-factor solution could resolve acknowledged methodological issues. Replication was needed to determine if this new model (D5-SD4) is a persistent phenomenon or a statistical artefact related to the original data. This study compared model fit and measurement invariance of original SD4 and D5-SD4 in 12 samples from 11 different countries ( N = 7045). The D5-SD4 exhibited better fit whether 28 items were used for the SD4, or only the shared 22. Measurement invariance and alignment optimization showed that D5-SD4 could be used to compare results between groups, which was not the case for the original SD4. The results demonstrate the reliability of the D5-SD4 structure in comparison to the SD4. Suggestions for the future improvements of the core dark traits model are given. • There have been persistent issues with measurement of the Dark Tetrad since inception. • Previous research identified a better fitting model for the SD4, called the Dark 5. • This paper explored the replicability of the five-factor model in 12 samples. • The Dark 5 demonstrated better fit than the SD4 across all samples. • Similar results were found for the shard 22 items and all 28 items.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Individual Differences
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113529
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dark Five - statistical anomaly or persistent phenomena: An exploratory investigation into the factor structure of the SD4 in multiple samples

Daniel Waldeck, C.N. Smyth, Andrija Dulović
Personality and Individual Differences
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

The Dark Five - statistical anomaly or persistent phenomena: An exploratory investigation into the factor structure of the SD4 in multiple samples

Daniel Waldeck, C.N. Smyth, Andrija Dulović
article en

Abstract

Recent analysis of the dark tetrad has tentatively proposed that a more appropriate representation of dark traits, consisting of 22 items loading onto a 5-factor solution could resolve acknowledged methodological issues. Replication was needed to determine if this new model (D5-SD4) is a persistent phenomenon or a statistical artefact related to the original data. This study compared model fit and measurement invariance of original SD4 and D5-SD4 in 12 samples from 11 different countries ( N = 7045). The D5-SD4 exhibited better fit whether 28 items were used for the SD4, or only the shared 22. Measurement invariance and alignment optimization showed that D5-SD4 could be used to compare results between groups, which was not the case for the original SD4. The results demonstrate the reliability of the D5-SD4 structure in comparison to the SD4. Suggestions for the future improvements of the core dark traits model are given. • There have been persistent issues with measurement of the Dark Tetrad since inception. • Previous research identified a better fitting model for the SD4, called the Dark 5. • This paper explored the replicability of the five-factor model in 12 samples. • The Dark 5 demonstrated better fit than the SD4 across all samples. • Similar results were found for the shard 22 items and all 28 items.

Personality and Individual DifferencesVol. 250
University of Staffordshire (GB), University of Montenegro (ME), Coventry University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.