Building an initial programme theory to explain how and why on-the-day surgery cancellations occur and how they might be reduced

On-the-day surgery cancellations (OTDSCs) have been a longstanding global problem, bringing significant suffering to patients and carers, and substantial waste across healthcare systems. Any cancellation of a surgery that occurs for any reason on the day of the scheduled surgery is defined as an OTDSC. Despite the high prevalence of OTDSCs, little is known about why they happen and how to minimise them. This study aimed to develop Initial Program Theories (IPTs) and share valuable insights that can form the basis for future evaluation of OTDSCs. We conducted a study to address the questions, “How do OTDSCs occur, and in what contexts can they be minimised?“. We used a qualitative and multi-stage approach to developing IPTs. Data collection included OTDSC literature (n = 35) identified from a systematic search, including feedback sessions with administrators (n = 10) from eight NHS trusts, two feedback events with patient expert advisers (n = 6), and expert practitioners (n = 8). The iterative analysis found that OTDSCs are a complex undesired outcome, influenced by many interconnected “variables” at macro-level (e.g., waiting-list policies, austerity measures and workforce shortages) and meso-level (e.g., workload, high emergency admissions and interruptions), as well as healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) and patients’ perceptions and behaviours. The study identified that failures in various aspects of individualised care (such as care planning, communication and resource allocation) in preparing for surgery before admission could also contribute to different types of OTDSCs. As a result of the complex and interconnected nature of OTDSCs and the wide variety of causes, it can be hard to reduce their occurrence. OTDSCs can be minimised by carefully considering various aspects of individualisation of care, such as clinical care planning, communication and resource allocation and delivery when preparing patients to undergo surgery. Providing favourable working conditions and creating effective knowledge transfer between the stakeholders initiating OTDSCs and HCPs who prepare patients for surgery can be critical to minimising most OTDSCs. The study developed a taxonomy and novel IPTs that have practical implications for policymakers and practitioners when designing interventions to minimise OTDSCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13592-x
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building an initial programme theory to explain how and why on-the-day surgery cancellations occur and how they might be reduced

Ross Millar, Mark Exworthy, Justin Avery Aunger, Buddhika S. W. Samarasinghe
BMC Health Services Research
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Building an initial programme theory to explain how and why on-the-day surgery cancellations occur and how they might be reduced

Ross Millar, Mark Exworthy, Justin Avery Aunger, Buddhika S. W. Samarasinghe
article en

Abstract

On-the-day surgery cancellations (OTDSCs) have been a longstanding global problem, bringing significant suffering to patients and carers, and substantial waste across healthcare systems. Any cancellation of a surgery that occurs for any reason on the day of the scheduled surgery is defined as an OTDSC. Despite the high prevalence of OTDSCs, little is known about why they happen and how to minimise them. This study aimed to develop Initial Program Theories (IPTs) and share valuable insights that can form the basis for future evaluation of OTDSCs. We conducted a study to address the questions, “How do OTDSCs occur, and in what contexts can they be minimised?“. We used a qualitative and multi-stage approach to developing IPTs. Data collection included OTDSC literature (n = 35) identified from a systematic search, including feedback sessions with administrators (n = 10) from eight NHS trusts, two feedback events with patient expert advisers (n = 6), and expert practitioners (n = 8). The iterative analysis found that OTDSCs are a complex undesired outcome, influenced by many interconnected “variables” at macro-level (e.g., waiting-list policies, austerity measures and workforce shortages) and meso-level (e.g., workload, high emergency admissions and interruptions), as well as healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) and patients’ perceptions and behaviours. The study identified that failures in various aspects of individualised care (such as care planning, communication and resource allocation) in preparing for surgery before admission could also contribute to different types of OTDSCs. As a result of the complex and interconnected nature of OTDSCs and the wide variety of causes, it can be hard to reduce their occurrence. OTDSCs can be minimised by carefully considering various aspects of individualisation of care, such as clinical care planning, communication and resource allocation and delivery when preparing patients to undergo surgery. Providing favourable working conditions and creating effective knowledge transfer between the stakeholders initiating OTDSCs and HCPs who prepare patients for surgery can be critical to minimising most OTDSCs. The study developed a taxonomy and novel IPTs that have practical implications for policymakers and practitioners when designing interventions to minimise OTDSCs.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 25(1)
NIHR Research Delivery Network (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.