Understanding the training need priorities of the Australian allied health workforce: a national survey

Allied health professionals (AHPs) are pivotal to delivering safe, effective, and collaborative healthcare. Yet, there is limited empirical insight into their current training need priorities across core domains of professional practice. In an increasingly digital, team-based health system, identifying profession-specific and shared training needs is essential for designing development strategies that retain and grow a future-ready workforce. This study aimed to identify training needs across the Australian AHP workforce and explore whether demographic factors predict perceived gaps between the importance and performance of key professional tasks, both within and across professional groups. A national cross-sectional survey of AHPs was conducted using the Hennessy Hicks Training Needs Analysis Questionnaire. Participants self-rated 30 core and 10 emerging tasks by perceived importance and current performance. Gap scores (importance minus performance) were analysed and visualised using an importance-performance matrix to highlight priority areas. Descriptive statistics, multiple regression models and multivariate analysis explored whether variation existed between profession and other demographic variables across seven domains of practice. From 2,436 valid responses a consistent pattern emerged: AHPs rated the importance of all tasks higher than their self-reported performance, highlighting statistically meaningful perceived capability gaps. The most pronounced needs were found in leadership/continuous improvement, and digital health domains. Emerging tasks such as managing work-life balance, achieving efficient results and identifying opportunities for quality improvement also ranked highly, reflecting the current landscape of AHP practice. While significant demographic differences including level of experience, highest qualification, profession and rurality were observed across domains, effect sizes were uniformly small, suggesting limited practical significance. This study provides the first national snapshot of AHP training needs and provides evidence that the future of allied health workforce development lies in shifting from siloed, discipline-specific training to capability-building that supports interdisciplinary, digitally enabled healthcare. Interprofessional education models provide an opportunity to address shared training needs in leadership, digital transformation, and system improvement, particularly for early-career professionals and those in remote roles. These findings highlight potential directions for aligning training with the evolving demands of healthcare delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08141-3
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the training need priorities of the Australian allied health workforce: a national survey

John R. Bartholomew, Chanelle Louwen, Karen Adams
BMC Medical Education
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Understanding the training need priorities of the Australian allied health workforce: a national survey

John R. Bartholomew, Chanelle Louwen, Karen Adams
article en

Abstract

Allied health professionals (AHPs) are pivotal to delivering safe, effective, and collaborative healthcare. Yet, there is limited empirical insight into their current training need priorities across core domains of professional practice. In an increasingly digital, team-based health system, identifying profession-specific and shared training needs is essential for designing development strategies that retain and grow a future-ready workforce. This study aimed to identify training needs across the Australian AHP workforce and explore whether demographic factors predict perceived gaps between the importance and performance of key professional tasks, both within and across professional groups. A national cross-sectional survey of AHPs was conducted using the Hennessy Hicks Training Needs Analysis Questionnaire. Participants self-rated 30 core and 10 emerging tasks by perceived importance and current performance. Gap scores (importance minus performance) were analysed and visualised using an importance-performance matrix to highlight priority areas. Descriptive statistics, multiple regression models and multivariate analysis explored whether variation existed between profession and other demographic variables across seven domains of practice. From 2,436 valid responses a consistent pattern emerged: AHPs rated the importance of all tasks higher than their self-reported performance, highlighting statistically meaningful perceived capability gaps. The most pronounced needs were found in leadership/continuous improvement, and digital health domains. Emerging tasks such as managing work-life balance, achieving efficient results and identifying opportunities for quality improvement also ranked highly, reflecting the current landscape of AHP practice. While significant demographic differences including level of experience, highest qualification, profession and rurality were observed across domains, effect sizes were uniformly small, suggesting limited practical significance. This study provides the first national snapshot of AHP training needs and provides evidence that the future of allied health workforce development lies in shifting from siloed, discipline-specific training to capability-building that supports interdisciplinary, digitally enabled healthcare. Interprofessional education models provide an opportunity to address shared training needs in leadership, digital transformation, and system improvement, particularly for early-career professionals and those in remote roles. These findings highlight potential directions for aligning training with the evolving demands of healthcare delivery.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 25(1)
Logan Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.