Hybrid democratic innovation as assemblage: Probing and extending an emerging concept for democratic-innovations research

The assemblage concept has recently been applied to the field of democratic innovations. Although ‘democratic assemblage’ as a sensitising concept can sharpen awareness to the mixing and mingling of divergent components that is going on in practices of hybrid democratic innovation (HDI), the current usage of the concept also has its limitations. We argue that to move forward with meaningful theoretical understanding of democratic assemblage, additional steps are required. In this article, we forge connections between assemblage theory and governance scholarship, more notably institutional and cultural theory, to offer a more comprehensive framework for analysing democratic innovations. This expanded approach enhances the analytical and explanatory power of the democratic-assemblage concept. The case of the recurrent reshuffling of PB in Antwerp, Belgium, is used in this article as a test case and grindstone for conceptual argumentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957251384867
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid democratic innovation as assemblage: Probing and extending an emerging concept for democratic-innovations research

Frank Hendriks, Shirley Kempeneer
1 citations
Politics
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
1.11
article

Hybrid democratic innovation as assemblage: Probing and extending an emerging concept for democratic-innovations research

Frank Hendriks, Shirley Kempeneer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The assemblage concept has recently been applied to the field of democratic innovations. Although ‘democratic assemblage’ as a sensitising concept can sharpen awareness to the mixing and mingling of divergent components that is going on in practices of hybrid democratic innovation (HDI), the current usage of the concept also has its limitations. We argue that to move forward with meaningful theoretical understanding of democratic assemblage, additional steps are required. In this article, we forge connections between assemblage theory and governance scholarship, more notably institutional and cultural theory, to offer a more comprehensive framework for analysing democratic innovations. This expanded approach enhances the analytical and explanatory power of the democratic-assemblage concept. The case of the recurrent reshuffling of PB in Antwerp, Belgium, is used in this article as a test case and grindstone for conceptual argumentation.

PoliticsVol. 46(1)
Tilburg University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hybrid democratic innovation as assemblage: Probing and extending an emerging concept for democratic-innovations research — Frank Hendriks, Shirley Kempeneer · Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS