Joke and Wordplay

This paper focuses on jokes and wordplays that are based on ambiguity in ancient literary sources. It begins with a simplified definition of ambiguity and illustrates its significance for humour. Next, the ancient theories of humour are presented, particularly the sources of laughter as elicited by Quintilian and Cicero. Aristotle’s categorisation of ambiguity will be helpful in analysing the different kinds of jokes they are the source of. This will lead into a catalogue of ambiguous jokes to showcase the range of this form. As expected, this begins with the comic poets Aristophanes and Plautus. I present also a few jokes from the Philogelos, a joke collection from approximately the fourth century AD, and conclude with jokes from Cicero and Augustus, as transmitted by Macrobius in his Saturnalia. As Quintilian (and Cicero in some sense) provides in his rhetorical handbook a rather – nomen omen – ambiguous evaluation of the jokes based on ambiguity I attempt to show a possible explanation of this apparent critique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classica Cracoviensia
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12797/cc.28.2025.28.01
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Joke and Wordplay

Matylda Amat Obryk
Classica Cracoviensia
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Joke and Wordplay

Matylda Amat Obryk
article en

Abstract

This paper focuses on jokes and wordplays that are based on ambiguity in ancient literary sources. It begins with a simplified definition of ambiguity and illustrates its significance for humour. Next, the ancient theories of humour are presented, particularly the sources of laughter as elicited by Quintilian and Cicero. Aristotle’s categorisation of ambiguity will be helpful in analysing the different kinds of jokes they are the source of. This will lead into a catalogue of ambiguous jokes to showcase the range of this form. As expected, this begins with the comic poets Aristophanes and Plautus. I present also a few jokes from the Philogelos, a joke collection from approximately the fourth century AD, and conclude with jokes from Cicero and Augustus, as transmitted by Macrobius in his Saturnalia. As Quintilian (and Cicero in some sense) provides in his rhetorical handbook a rather – nomen omen – ambiguous evaluation of the jokes based on ambiguity I attempt to show a possible explanation of this apparent critique.

Classica CracoviensiaVol. 28
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.