Love on the Ground: Reflections on Christian Faith and the Profession of Arms

ABSTRACT In this paper, I explore how Christian moral teaching properly shapes deliberation and decision‐making in the very interstices of war—the face‐to‐face violence between small units in the context of urban combat. I will focus throughout on one junior officer in one combat setting in one war—on how a young Marine lieutenant aspired to comply with the requirement that, as Nigel Biggar says, love of neighbor must “qualify” the way combatants use military violence. In so doing, I support one of Biggar’s more controversial claims, viz., that Christian love, robustly understood, can “walk the battlefield”—although love need not tread exactly as Biggar recommends. I will thereafter briefly reflect on the role that religious faith properly plays in the professional decisions of officers who serve in the military of a liberal democracy. I conclude by noting some implications of my discussion for how we best think about the relation between religion and war more generally.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Religious Ethics
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.70010
Primary Topic
War, Ethics, and Justification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Love on the Ground: Reflections on Christian Faith and the Profession of Arms

Christopher J. Eberle
Journal of Religious Ethics
War, Ethics, and Justification
article

Love on the Ground: Reflections on Christian Faith and the Profession of Arms

Christopher J. Eberle
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, I explore how Christian moral teaching properly shapes deliberation and decision‐making in the very interstices of war—the face‐to‐face violence between small units in the context of urban combat. I will focus throughout on one junior officer in one combat setting in one war—on how a young Marine lieutenant aspired to comply with the requirement that, as Nigel Biggar says, love of neighbor must “qualify” the way combatants use military violence. In so doing, I support one of Biggar’s more controversial claims, viz., that Christian love, robustly understood, can “walk the battlefield”—although love need not tread exactly as Biggar recommends. I will thereafter briefly reflect on the role that religious faith properly plays in the professional decisions of officers who serve in the military of a liberal democracy. I conclude by noting some implications of my discussion for how we best think about the relation between religion and war more generally.

Journal of Religious EthicsVol. 53(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
War, Ethics, and Justification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Love on the Ground: Reflections on Christian Faith and the Profession of Arms — Christopher J. Eberle · Journal of Religious Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS